Teams

W18-3.0-Colinas-Michelle Matos

Adult 18 & Over 2021 · W18-18 & Over Women 3.0-Flight 2

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-09-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesYamile Alicea vs Monica Alonso5-7, 3-6
2021-08-29Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Ostolaza / Brenda Rodriguez vs Iris Torrens / Thynia Rivera3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesYamile Alicea vs Monica Alonso2-6, 3-6
2021-08-28Split 11
L#1 DoublesBrenda Rodriguez / Elaine Isaac vs Sheila Gomez / Nilda Santiago5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesYamile Alicea vs Luciann Colon Concepcion6-4, 7-5
2021-08-21Lost 02
L#1 SinglesBrenda Rodriguez vs Monica Alonso4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesYamile Alicea / Yadira Cardona vs Koralis Ferreira Aguayo / Noreliz Ferreira Quinones4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-08-19vs W18-3.0-Ponce-Ileana NigaglioniLost 01
L#2 DoublesRahiza Lebron / Yamile Alicea vs Ileana Nigaglioni / Andrea Medina4-6, 2-6
2021-08-14vs W18-3.0-Ponce-Ileana NigaglioniLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrenda Rodriguez vs Milagros Rivera5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJOHMARY MELENDEZ RIVERA / Yamile Alicea vs Ileana Nigaglioni / Ileann Cruz - (DQ)2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesYamile Alicea / Brenda Rodriguez vs Janeth Rodriguez / Nicole Hernandez5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJOHMARY MELENDEZ RIVERA / Yamile Alicea vs Karla Soto / Veronica Diaz6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrenda Rodriguez vs Cynthia Rosario7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2021-07-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesYamile Alicea vs Luciann Colon Concepcion7-6, 6-4
2021-07-17Lost 01
L#1 SinglesYamile Alicea vs Luciann Colon Concepcion7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W18-18 & Over Women 3.0-Flight 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Yamile Alicea
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
Ileana Vazquez
published 3
2.72
Brenda Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Norma Suarez
published
2.39
Rahiza Lebron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Rodriguez + Yamile Alicea044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Yamile Alicea
124W–102L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Ileana Vazquez
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
JOHMARY MELENDEZ RIVERA
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Brenda Rodriguez
62W–105L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Norma Suarez
25W–39L career · no lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
2.41
Rahiza Lebron
15W–35L career · no lines in 2021
81%19%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.