Teams

300/Pauly 7.5

2026 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_2

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Madison Sagas
published 4
3.85
Alison Andrus
published 4
3.75
Caroli Harkness
published 4
3.54
Taiana Mendez
published
3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.35
Kannika Torres
published
3.33
Angie Gomez
published 3.5
3.30
Natalie Ebner
published
3.25
Yaramarie Munoz
published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Booth
published 3.5
3.21
Camille Pauly
published 3.5
3.17
Jodi Cox
published
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yaramarie Munoz + Lisa Booth6456% games−0.7% vs expected
Alison Andrus + Kim Magee1537% games−8.6% vs expected
Alison Andrus + Madison Sagas5066% gamesnot enough data
Taiana Mendez + Yaramarie Munoz033 matchesnot enough data
Taiana Mendez + Alison Andrus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madison Sagas
47W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Caroli Harkness
2W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Taiana Mendez
23W–37L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Kannika Torres
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Angie Gomez
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Natalie Ebner
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Yaramarie Munoz
40W–62L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Lisa Booth
168W–85L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Camille Pauly
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Jodi Cox
6W–17L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.