Teams

St George-Horton

UTA Tri Level League · 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-08vs St George-BurkeWon 20
W#1 DoublesASHLEY KEZOS / Jill Russell vs Teresa Burke / Lisa Bledsoe6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDione Russell / Janet Lightheart vs Andrea Ward / Suzy Duce6-4, 6-1
2024-10-01vs St George-BurkeWon 21
W#1 DoublesSyndee Kemp / ASHLEY KEZOS vs Lisa Bledsoe / Daphne Schroth6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Johnson / Janelle Horton vs Judith Hutcheson / Alexa Morgan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDione Russell / Robyn Welch vs Suzy Duce / Cara Garner6-2, 6-2
2024-09-26vs St George-DrabickiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSyndee Kemp / ASHLEY KEZOS vs Debbie Barbaroussis-Goot / Marya Farnsworth6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDione Russell / Janet Lightheart vs Katrina Swift / Bethany Baker6-0, 6-1
2024-09-19vs St George-BurkeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Russell / Syndee Kemp vs Teresa Burke / Lisa Bledsoe6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanelle Horton / Hailee Horton vs Alexa Morgan / Judith Hutcheson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Lightheart / Robyn Welch vs Cara Garner / Andrea Ward6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-17vs St George-DrabickiWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Russell / ASHLEY KEZOS vs Nancy Drabicki / Marya Farnsworth6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanet Lightheart / Dione Russell vs Julie Robinson / Bethany Baker6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1St George-Horton411051299
2St George-Drabicki236922164
3St George-Burke2481022151

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Linda Johnson
published
3.41
Syndee Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Janelle Horton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Dione Russell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Jill Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Janet Lightheart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Hailee Horton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Lightheart + Dione Russell9948% games−0.1% vs expected
Janet Lightheart + Syndee Kemp134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Johnson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Syndee Kemp
38W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
3.41
Janelle Horton
58W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Dione Russell
28W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Jill Russell
54W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
3
Janet Lightheart
53W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Hailee Horton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.