Teams

Eells & Callahan: Elmcrest

2023 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.21 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-06vs Jenkins & Wichhart: NDACLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurie Mead / Lindy Christensen vs Laura Frey Law / Catherine Bishop5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCait Klenk vs Karen Davison2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Worden / Elisha Horsfall vs Christina Donelson / Penny Raia6-7, 1-6
2023-04-01vs IA/Langdon-Wiley/18&Over3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesChristine McLaughlin / Holly Ervin vs Lois Blankenship / Sorina Abernathey4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Worden vs Anne Jasper2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Lewis / Rachel Rigdon vs Nikki Skogman / Emily Flowergarden4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCait Klenk vs Michelle Novak1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElisha Horsfall / Claire Callahan vs Rochelle Galbraith / Lyla Schweiger1-6, 3-6
2023-02-25vs Jenkins & Wichhart: NDACWon 32
W#1 DoublesKathy Keel Moeder / Laurie Mead vs Christina Donelson / Penny Raia6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindy Christensen vs Sarah Franje6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Kramer / Rachel Rigdon vs Kathy Jenkins / Lisa Hammer0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAmy Worden vs Karen Davison4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElisha Horsfall / Chelsea Hughes vs Laura Frey Law / Sonja Smith2-6, 3-6
2023-02-18vs IA/Langdon-Wiley/18&Over3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesDebra Callahan / Amy Worden vs Sally Wiley / Carol Renz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Anne Jasper1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Keel Moeder / Christine McLaughlin vs Jenny Skogman / Andrea Norris6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesCait Klenk vs Michelle Novak4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Lewis / Laurie Mead vs Emily Flowergarden / Rochelle Galbraith6-2, 6-4
2023-02-04vs Jenkins & Wichhart: NDACLost 14
W#1 DoublesDebra Callahan / Lindy Christensen vs Penny Raia / Carla Schmidt6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Sarah Franje0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Hughes / Christine McLaughlin vs Kathy Jenkins / Catherine Bishop1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCait Klenk vs Jeniece Nott2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Lewis / Elisha Horsfall vs Sonja Smith / Lisa Hammer2-6, 1-6
2023-01-07vs IA/Langdon-Wiley/18&Over3.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesKathy Keel Moeder / Amy Worden vs Sally Wiley / Elizabeth Ekberg6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Kramer vs Jennifer Kemmerer2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLindy Christensen / Laurie Mead vs Sorina Abernathey / Sandra Monahan6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCait Klenk vs Erin Langdon1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRachel Rigdon / Karen Lewis vs Carol Renz / Emily Flowergarden4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Langdon-Wiley/18&Over3.0W6024616200
2IAWC/Lu-Graf/18&Over3.0W51201023208
3VanVark & Cownie: LifeTime4222821194
4Mullin & Baddeloo: DMG33161430239
5Jenkins & Wichhart: NDAC24141634265
6Eells & Callahan: Elmcrest1572347319
7Champion & Everett: LifeTime0622857358

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Cait Klenk
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Debra Callahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Holly Ervin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Kathy Keel Moeder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Worden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Claire Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Elisha Horsfall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Julie Kramer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Laurie Mead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Christine McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lindy Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rachel Rigdon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Mead + Lindy Christensen213 matchesnot enough data
Debra Callahan + Cait Klenk303 matchesnot enough data
Amy Worden + Elisha Horsfall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cait Klenk
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debra Callahan
19W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Holly Ervin
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
Kathy Keel Moeder
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Amy Worden
5W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Claire Callahan
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Elisha Horsfall
10W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.62
Julie Kramer
5W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Laurie Mead
28W–22L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Christine McLaughlin
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lindy Christensen
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Rigdon
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.