Teams

Boone Park - Mills

2023 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-10vs Florida/Kochis/18&Over4.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesFaye Woods / Darlene Turner vs Cynthia McGehee / Lauren Schilkofski1-6, 2-6
2023-06-03vs San Jose - RechyLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarlene Turner / Faye Woods vs Kristen Lancaster / Sue Levin1-6, 1-6
2023-05-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFaye Woods / Darlene Turner vs Heather Arrowsmith / Katie Farrar3-6, 2-6
2023-05-20vs Florida/Kochis/18&Over4.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesCecilia Collins / Faye Woods vs Andrea Griswell / Marianne Harper1-6, 1-6
2023-05-13vs Marsh Landing - BushSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Munson / Kathy Roan vs Jennifer Katsolis / Elena Sise3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDarlene Turner / Faye Woods vs Julie Weiss / Alden Patel6-1, 6-2
2023-04-30vs San Jose - RechyLost 01
L#1 DoublesFaye Woods / Michiele Sherman vs Loretta Zubero / Andrea Frick1-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs Marsh Landing - BushLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Roan / Jennifer Munson vs Geraldine Sy / Jennifer Katsolis2-6, 2-6
2023-04-01vs Marsh Landing - BushSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFaye Woods / Darlene Turner vs Mary Bush / Janet Thomasson2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Roan / Lisa Gilberstadt vs Helen Ciesla / Tanya Reimschissel7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Cecilia Collins
published 4.5
4.26
Carolina Delgado
published 4.5
3.98
Faye Woods
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.95
Catherine Lee
published 4.5
3.93
Michiele Sherman
published
3.75
Kathy Roan
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Darlene Turner
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Jennifer Munson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darlene Turner + Faye Woods3840% games−7.5% vs expected
Darlene Turner + Michiele Sherman3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cecilia Collins
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Carolina Delgado
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
Faye Woods
33W–58L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
4.5
Catherine Lee
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.95
Michiele Sherman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Kathy Roan
92W–72L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Darlene Turner
66W–83L career · 7 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jennifer Munson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.