Teams

Avila - A. Stafford

2024 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#3 DoublesCrystal Whitescarver / Natalia Heberlein vs Hannah Gabora / Christine Marshall0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-29vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Hasselbach / Crystal Whitescarver vs Barbara Castro / Marisol Cohen6-2, 7-6
2024-04-22vs Cheval Servivors - M. ChevalierLost 01
L#3 DoublesVanessa Bergin / Crystal Whitescarver vs Vera Trayner / Allyson Goodart2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGina Lund / Crystal Whitescarver vs Anne McKenna / Hyun Kim1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Anne Stafford
published 3.5
2.89
Giliane Rifai
published
2.88
Gina Lund
published
2.84
Yeon Thomas
published
2.80
Laura Southwell
published
2.78
Joy Themides
published
2.78
Marguerite Milliken
published
2.76
Stacey Lee
published
2.72
Crystal Whitescarver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Nicole Hasselbach
published
2.57
Natalia Heberlein
published
2.33
Vanessa Bergin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yeon Thomas + Stacey Lee6170% games+9.1% vs expected
Gina Lund + Joy Themides4450% games+0.9% vs expected
Yeon Thomas + Laura Southwell5158% games−3.7% vs expected
Laura Southwell + Joy Themides4257% gamesnot enough data
Marguerite Milliken + Stacey Lee303 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Lee + Laura Southwell213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Southwell + Gina Lund123 matchesnot enough data
Gina Lund + Anne Stafford303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Stafford
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Giliane Rifai
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.89
Gina Lund
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Yeon Thomas
17W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Laura Southwell
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Joy Themides
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Marguerite Milliken
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Stacey Lee
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Crystal Whitescarver
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.72
Nicole Hasselbach
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
Natalia Heberlein
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
Vanessa Bergin
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.