Teams

Alachua/Zerbe/55&Over6.0W

2024 Alachua Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-03vs JTC Fearless 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesMargaret Zerbe / Rachael Seidler vs Sriyani Dissanayake / Wanda Cross6-4, 6-3
2024-02-20vs JTC Fearless 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Woolley / Rachael Seidler vs Marianne Eberhard / Terry Rodriguez6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-02-10vs JTC Fearless 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Margaret Zerbe vs Stacey Berceli / Quynn Gingrich6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-03vs JTC Fearless 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Julie Skoby vs Sriyani Dissanayake / Terry Rodriguez5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-01vs JTC Fearless 55+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRachael Seidler / Helen Ingmarsson vs Terry Rodriguez / Sriyani Dissanayake6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-20vs JTC Fearless 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesHelen Ingmarsson / Jill Womble vs Marianne Eberhard / Linda Sheehan6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Michelle Burns
published
2.94
Helen Ingmarsson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Margaret Zerbe
published 3
2.80
Rachael Seidler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Raksha Ramkissoon
published
2.78
Colleen Anderson
published 3
2.75
Margie McLellan
published
2.68
Patricia Woolley
published
Julie Skoby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachael Seidler + Michelle Burns5155% gamesnot enough data
Raksha Ramkissoon + Patricia Woolley224 matchesnot enough data
Helen Ingmarsson + Margaret Zerbe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Burns
26W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
Helen Ingmarsson
42W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Margaret Zerbe
27W–40L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Rachael Seidler
77W–122L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Raksha Ramkissoon
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Colleen Anderson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Margie McLellan
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Patricia Woolley
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Julie Skoby
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.