Teams

WRAC-Noyd

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-25vs PFC-WillmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Lester / Tracy Yount vs Steve Lamberson / Charles McElligott6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGreg Brizendine / Mark Taylor vs Robert Vancott / Bill Popp6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Aaron Richmond vs Ray Willman / John Omlin4-6, 6-7
2025-10-25vs YTC-Golden BallWon 30
W#1 DoublesGreg Brizendine / Bryan Noyd vs Guislain Lagron / Rick Vaughan6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRichard Lester / Mark Taylor vs Shawn Tweedy / Chris Cantrell6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Aaron Richmond vs John Fernandez / Craig Richardson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-24vs HRSC-The Daft GeezersWon 30
W#1 DoublesGreg Brizendine / Bryan Noyd vs John Durkan / Doug Orr6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Lester / Tracy Yount vs Tim Arbogast / Damon Clegg6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrad Bartol / Aaron Richmond vs William Gilchrist / Charles Eastwood6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Bartol
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bryan Noyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.74
Aaron Richmond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Greg Brizendine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Bendtsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Lester
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tracy Yount
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Bendtsen + Brad Bartol17367% games+5.4% vs expected
Michael Bendtsen + Bryan Noyd11560% games−5.3% vs expected
Greg Brizendine + Bryan Noyd5162% gamesnot enough data
Richard Lester + Mark Taylor213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Bendtsen + Aaron Richmond123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Bartol
39W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Bryan Noyd
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Aaron Richmond
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
Greg Brizendine
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Taylor
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Bendtsen
67W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Lester
38W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracy Yount
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.