Teams

Cathy & Willy

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.60 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-02-28vs OATLost 12
L#1 DoublesRamon Luna / Catherine Stone vs Phuripak Sukanthanag / Saharra McKee0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWilly Stone / Bonnie Hemry vs Phu Ngo / Walaiporn Sukanthanag3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hemry / Penny Rohacek vs Krisada Meephothong / Lucille Abe6-4, 6-0
2021-02-21vs A to ZWon 10
W#1 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Matthew Hemry vs Jessie Lief / Andre Lief6-4, 6-3
2021-02-14vs BrockWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Bonnie Hemry vs Paul Wilcox / Aracelis Bell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCurtis Nelson / Penny Rohacek vs Patrick Rumley / ELIZE Rumley6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRamon Luna / Catherine Stone vs Gregory Bidwell / Karen Loeffler6-2, 6-4
2021-02-06vs Mystery TeamWon 21
W#1 DoublesCurtis Nelson / Penny Rohacek vs Konrad Kaltemborn / Conita Mullett6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBonnie Hemry / Willy Stone vs Matt Bottini / Kayleigh Bottini6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Marco Terracciano / Leith Parson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-01-24vs Paul RisseWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Janet Bidwell / Steven Maya4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Curtis Nelson vs Allison Burand / Harrison Alford6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Hemry / Willy Stone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-01-17vs Team 7Won 21
W#1 DoublesWilly Stone / Bonnie Hemry vs Stacia Green / Anthony Brooks6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPenny Rohacek / Curtis Nelson vs John Carlson / Emily Elison6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Stone / Ramon Luna vs Jay Green / Susan Brunner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Catherine Stone
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
Matthew Hemry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Curtis Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
2.87
Willy Stone
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Penny Rohacek
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3
Bonnie Hemry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Stone + Willy Stone21858% games+13.8% vs expected
Curtis Nelson + Penny Rohacek6555% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Stone
189W–51L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Matthew Hemry
44W–34L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Curtis Nelson
72W–65L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
3
Willy Stone
110W–70L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Penny Rohacek
49W–47L career · 11 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
2.67
Bonnie Hemry
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.