Teams

Love All - Wofford

2025 Montgomery Doubles Fall Women · Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-19vs Pugh - Norbeck YellowjacketsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Greenside / DC Smith vs Jodi Dalpe / Lucy Sullivan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-12-02vs Spencer - Start with LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Scurfield / Deborah Greenside vs Rachele Stines / Jean Chaisson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-11-25vs Dobson - LakewoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Greenside / Mary Barton-Dock vs Abbe Gross / Margaret Fitzwilliam6-4, 6-3
2025-10-30vs Spencer - Start with LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Greenside / Marcella Trowern vs Kate Panza / Julia Power6-3, 6-1
2025-10-24vs Maureen Smith - ManorWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Greenside / Tracy Ballard vs Diana DePaul / Julie Gutierrez6-4, 7-6
2025-10-21vs Pels - Edge PlusLost 01
L#1 DoublesVeronique Kessler / Deborah Greenside vs Elizabeth Nicholson / Caroline Hickey3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Fall 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Deborah Greenside
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.39
Shannon Golub
published
3.38
Penelope Bell
published
3.35
Marcella Trowern
published
3.34
Lisa Schneiderman
published
3.33
3.26
Karoline Shannon
published
3.19
Mary Barton-Dock
published
3.19
SARAH OETGEN
published
3.18
Tracy Ballard
published
3.16
DC Smith
published 3.5
3.12
Jill Bruno
published
3.05
Cecilia Kenary
published 3.5
2.97
Veronique Kessler
published
Lexi Mckay
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Greenside
139W–167L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Shannon Golub
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Penelope Bell
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Marcella Trowern
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Lisa Schneiderman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
Roxanna Losada Radley
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Karoline Shannon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Mary Barton-Dock
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
SARAH OETGEN
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Tracy Ballard
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
DC Smith
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Jill Bruno
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cecilia Kenary
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Veronique Kessler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Lexi Mckay
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.