Teams

GSTL 18/Berry/Grande Dunes

2025 Adult 18 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-08vs GSTL18/LaPerle/PrestwickSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnna Kirby / Sherri Meyers vs Jolynn Prochaska / Stacy Hughes6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDottie Kinlaw / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Linda Tangeman / Heather Johnson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Elliott vs Amanda Battisti2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesConstance Brophy / Sandy McAlpine vs Rene Smith / Rosemary Folk6-2, 6-2
2025-04-24vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelle Siegmund / Debbie Johnson vs Caroline Zito / Meredith Monroe6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Berry / Catherine Hill vs Amanda Drosieko / Mary Elizabeth Klein6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKelly Elliott vs Camilla Parker3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJan Berry / Sandy McAlpine vs Doreen Cribb / Cynthia Moran6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-10vs GSTL18/LaPerle/PrestwickWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnna Kirby / Constance Brophy vs Kimberly Case / Sarah LaPerle3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKelly Elliott vs Allison DeVaux6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnna Berry / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Myla Cabildo / Elizabeth Daniel6-2, 6-0
2025-04-02vs GSTL18/LaPerle/PrestwickLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeanne Johnson Stephens / Catherine Hill vs Jolynn Prochaska / Stacy Hughes6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelle Siegmund / Anna Berry vs Rosemary Folk / Rene Smith6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJan Berry / Sandy McAlpine vs Heather Johnson / Kimberly Case6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesLost 13
W#1 DoublesDebbie Johnson / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Amanda Drosieko / Shayne Matthews4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherri Meyers / Sandy McAlpine vs Doreen Cribb / Meredith Monroe2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Elliott vs Nikola Faust6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Kirby / Jan Berry vs Elle Jones / Alice Whiteside2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-06vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDebbie Johnson / Kelle Siegmund vs Camilla Parker / Alice Whiteside6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Kirby / Sherri Meyers vs Elle Jones / Alice Puckett7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelly Elliott vs Caroline Zito6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesConstance Brophy / Sandy McAlpine vs Ayla Woods / Amanda Davis0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-27vs GSTL18/LaPerle/PrestwickSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDenise Watts / Catherine Hill vs Linda Tangeman / Heather Johnson6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Johnson / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Jolynn Prochaska / Stacy Hughes2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKelle Siegmund vs Sarah LaPerle6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnna Berry / Jan Berry vs Rene Smith / Shital Patel6-7, 2-6
2025-02-17vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelle Siegmund / Debbie Johnson vs Doreen Cribb / Camilla Parker6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Berry / Sandy McAlpine vs Nikola Faust / Mary Elizabeth Klein6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKelly Elliott vs Caroline Zito6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesConstance Brophy / Deanne Johnson Stephens vs Kerri Evans / Meredith Monroe3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Berry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Catherine Hill
published 4
3.52
Denise Watts
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.51
Anna Kirby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Deanne Johnson Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Constance Brophy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.20
Sandy McAlpine
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Sherri Meyers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dottie Kinlaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jan Berry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelle Siegmund
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Elliott
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Berry
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Catherine Hill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Denise Watts
16W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Anna Kirby
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Deanne Johnson Stephens
19W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
4
Constance Brophy
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.30
Sandy McAlpine
2W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.20
Sherri Meyers
18W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Dottie Kinlaw
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jan Berry
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelle Siegmund
7W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Elliott
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.