Teams

CTL18/HOBBS/CTC

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-23vs CTL18/Lattimore/CTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBailey Wolfe / William Wolfe vs Jordan Ross / John Coward7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMargaret Deans Grantz / Patrick Dimarco vs Reilly Browning / Grant Jarratt3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Ribock / Derrick Grantz vs Arden Riley / Cody Lattimore4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-09vs CTL18/Lattimore/CTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDerrick Grantz / Pippi Gandy vs Kelsey Hartvigsen / Grant Jarratt2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMollie Hobbs / Chris Zecopoulos vs Arden Riley / Travis Mitchell6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKirstin Dimarco / Patrick Dimarco vs Marley Smith / Rhett Clark3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-02vs CTL18/Lattimore/CTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Ribock / Derrick Grantz vs Kelsey Hartvigsen / Rhett Clark7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBailey Wolfe / William Wolfe vs Marley Smith / Travis Mitchell0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSamantha Zecopoulos / Chris Zecopoulos vs Arden Riley / John Coward6-3, 6-4
2026-05-19vs CTL18/Lattimore/CTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Zecopoulos / Chris Zecopoulos vs Kelsey Hartvigsen / Grant Jarratt3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMollie Hobbs / Derrick Grantz vs Reilly Browning / Cody Lattimore4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-12vs CTL18/Lattimore/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Zecopoulos / Pippi Gandy vs Grant Jarratt / Kelsey Hartvigsen3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDerrick Grantz / Margaret Deans Grantz vs Cody Lattimore / Arden Riley2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMollie Hobbs / Patrick Dimarco vs Marley Smith / Travis Mitchell5-7, 3-6
2026-05-05vs CTL18/Lattimore/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamantha Zecopoulos / Chris Zecopoulos vs Kelsey Hartvigsen / Grant Jarratt5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMollie Hobbs / Derrick Grantz vs Arden Riley / John Coward1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBailey Wolfe / William Wolfe vs Marley Smith / Cody Lattimore1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Mixed 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL18/Lattimore/CTC4212615132
2CTL18/HOBBS/CTC2461228202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Mollie Hobbs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Samantha Zecopoulos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Pippi Gandy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Margaret Deans Grantz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Bailey Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Chris Zecopoulos
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Amy Ribock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Derrick Grantz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kirstin Dimarco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Dimarco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
William Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Zecopoulos + Samantha Zecopoulos123 matchesnot enough data
Bailey Wolfe + William Wolfe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mollie Hobbs
14W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.79
Samantha Zecopoulos
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.70
Pippi Gandy
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Margaret Deans Grantz
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Bailey Wolfe
5W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Chris Zecopoulos
2W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Amy Ribock
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Derrick Grantz
2W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Kirstin Dimarco
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Dimarco
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Wolfe
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.