Teams

CBRC-Smarter, Not Harder!

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-26vs Palouse-HigginsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLarry Floyd / Gordon Slysz vs John Cattell / Danny Mullins6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPane Stankovic / Derek Peacock vs Mark Jackson / Alan Johnson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAdam Hrebeniuk / Nikolla Qafoku vs Tom Strobel / Daniel Higgins7-5, 6-2
2025-10-26vs EW-YTC-LozanoLost 12
W#1 DoublesLarry Floyd / Gordon Slysz vs James Degrasse / David Elofson6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDerek Peacock / Pane Stankovic vs Doug Conboy / Richard Lozano3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMing Li / Nikolla Qafoku vs Robert Schefter / Jeff Brantner0-6, 1-6
2025-10-25vs EW-PFC-SatreLost 12
W#1 DoublesLarry Floyd / Gordon Slysz vs John Williams / Tim Qualls6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Sands / Derek Peacock vs Kevin Jones / Tom Timperman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPane Stankovic / Nikolla Qafoku vs Glen Satre / Carl Bruscoe3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-25vs EW-YTC-LozanoLost 12
L#1 DoublesLarry Floyd / Adam Hrebeniuk vs Kevin Tweed / Doug Conboy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPane Stankovic / Derek Peacock vs Jim Stewart / Richard Lozano6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMing Li / Nikolla Qafoku vs Wally Morrison / Jeff Brantner3-6, 1-6
2025-10-24vs EW-PFC-SatreLost 12
L#1 DoublesPane Stankovic / Gordon Slysz vs Kevin Jones / Tom Timperman3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Hrebeniuk / Larry Floyd vs Craig Fager / Guy Schneider6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNikolla Qafoku / Ming Li vs Tim Qualls / Glen Satre6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-24vs Palouse-HigginsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdam Hrebeniuk / Larry Floyd vs Mark Jackson / John Cattell7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPane Stankovic / Gordon Slysz vs Daniel Higgins / Danny Mullins6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Sands / Derek Peacock vs Alan Johnson / Kent Davis6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Adam Hrebeniuk
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.84
Larry Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.77
Gordon Slysz
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Darin Edwards
published 4
3.69
Pane Stankovic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.63
Ming Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Nikolla Qafoku
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Derek Peacock
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
John Sands
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikolla Qafoku + Ming Li4645% games−11.9% vs expected
Nikolla Qafoku + Pane Stankovic2352% gamesnot enough data
Adam Hrebeniuk + Larry Floyd3254% gamesnot enough data
Ming Li + Pane Stankovic134 matchesnot enough data
Gordon Slysz + Larry Floyd404 matchesnot enough data
Nikolla Qafoku + Derek Peacock213 matchesnot enough data
Ming Li + John Sands213 matchesnot enough data
Pane Stankovic + Derek Peacock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Hrebeniuk
87W–87L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.89
Larry Floyd
38W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Gordon Slysz
31W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Darin Edwards
10W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Pane Stankovic
24W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Ming Li
20W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Nikolla Qafoku
32W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Derek Peacock
22W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
John Sands
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.