Teams

LCTA18/Harrah/DIC

STA 18 & Over Combo Doubles · 18 & Over Combo Women 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-23vs LCTA18/Hale/MPRLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Harrah / Grayson Potts vs Kristen Clark / Annmarie Taggio6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKerri Long / Jennifer Noone vs Lindsey Kutlick / Rebecca Overdorf1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeah Frey / Lee Propes vs Barnes Dix / Melissa Gross3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Ann Harrah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Denise Devine
published 4.5
4.12
Kerri Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Bettina Routh
published 4.5
3.97
Christine Zavada
published 4.5
3.88
Grayson Potts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Jennifer Noone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Lisa Keller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Alison Rainero
published 4
3.65
Leah Frey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Lee Propes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Erin Randall
published
3.55
Cathlyn Ostrem
published 4
Emily Little
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grayson Potts + Alison Rainero131252% games+2.7% vs expected
Erin Randall + Cathlyn Ostrem151550% games−0.3% vs expected
Grayson Potts + Lee Propes1643% games−7.7% vs expected
Leah Frey + Lee Propes4939% games−16.3% vs expected
Jennifer Noone + Lisa Keller7254% gamesnot enough data
Cathlyn Ostrem + Jennifer Noone2438% gamesnot enough data
Leah Frey + Lisa Keller2345% gamesnot enough data
Grayson Potts + Jennifer Noone4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ann Harrah
39W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Denise Devine
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Kerri Long
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Bettina Routh
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Christine Zavada
14W–42L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Grayson Potts
42W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jennifer Noone
48W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Lisa Keller
42W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Alison Rainero
22W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Leah Frey
21W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
Lee Propes
24W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
Erin Randall
29W–28L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Cathlyn Ostrem
37W–38L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Emily Little
57W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.