Teams

Bittner

2025 Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday · Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-24vs McMullenWon 21
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Gretchen Leitch6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCarey Mottet vs Tricia Hodnett7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJolene Lopez vs Daniela Silitra6-0, 6-0
2025-03-17vs CF Singles- McQuillianSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Alkinoe Meyer4-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesChandra Bittner vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-0, 6-0
2025-03-03vs McMullenWon 21
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Gretchen Leitch2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChandra Bittner vs Daniela Silitra6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCarey Mottet vs Lynn Colavita6-2, 6-3
2025-02-10vs McMullenWon 20
W#2 SinglesKarin Arnold vs Daniela Silitra6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJolene Lopez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-20vs McMullenLost 03
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Jerien Okoh-Tisch1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesCarey Mottet vs Katharine Nassauer3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Suzanne McMullen0-6, 5-5
2025-01-13vs CF Singles- McQuillianSplit 11
L#2 SinglesKarin Arnold vs Alkinoe Meyer2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesPeggah Wilson vs Fiona Campbell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Christeen Tolle
published 3.5
3.33
Carolyn Mccarter
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Chandra Bittner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Karin Arnold
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Peggah Wilson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
3.13
Ursula Cox
published
3.07
Carey Mottet
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Rebecca Norman
published
2.87
Jolene Lopez
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chandra Bittner + Peggah Wilson15857% games+3.4% vs expected
Karin Arnold + Peggah Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christeen Tolle
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Carolyn Mccarter
89W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Chandra Bittner
112W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Karin Arnold
91W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Peggah Wilson
148W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Ursula Cox
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carey Mottet
111W–101L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Rebecca Norman
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Jolene Lopez
80W–113L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.