Teams

LKRay/Jetton

2023 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-02vs LVArnam/LNTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSharon Cantey / Gretchen Kohlhepp vs Amy Brandon / Donna Upchurch6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Beam / SHARON WELLS vs Alva Bates / Lisa van Arnam6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-10vs LVArnam/LNTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Ray / Jayme Lemke vs Debbie Newman / Lisa van Arnam2-6, 2-6
2023-03-25vs LVArnam/LNTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Ray / Leslie Shipley vs Lisa van Arnam / Debbie Newman2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSharon Cantey / Linda Dagit vs Amy Brandon / Terry Sargent3-6, 4-6
2023-03-15vs LVArnam/LNTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Dagit / Sharon Cantey vs Amy Brandon / Donna Upchurch3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Bogojevich / Susanna Wagner vs Julie Mudge / Susan Lunsford2-6, 4-6
2023-03-11vs LVArnam/LNTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGretchen Kohlhepp / Sharon Cantey vs Annie Perrino / Terry Sargent7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Ray / Linda Dagit vs Amy Brandon / Donna Upchurch3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
SHARON WELLS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Jodi Patterson
published
3.47
Christine Bogojevich
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Karen Ray
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Jayme Lemke
published
3.11
Tracy Podesta
published
3.06
Sharon Cantey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Gretchen Kohlhepp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ray + Sharon Cantey0632% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
SHARON WELLS
119W–49L career · 1 line in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Jodi Patterson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Christine Bogojevich
163W–96L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Karen Ray
105W–157L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jayme Lemke
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Tracy Podesta
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Sharon Cantey
31W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Gretchen Kohlhepp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.