Teams

Barnes 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 2.5 Women Fall Singles

5 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Kaitlin Singh2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesJanice Wuebker vs Kimberly Bly7-6, 7-6
2025-10-14vs Watts 2.5W Fall SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Jenifer Checo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Katlyn Staub1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTamenika Delgado vs Erica Harden3-6, 0-6
2025-10-07vs Hanger 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMLost 01
L#2 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Teri MacDonald Cadieux2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Allison Chisholm6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKarin Rochester vs Tener Starling1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Kimberly Bly6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJanice Wuebker vs Kaitlin Singh0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTamenika Delgado vs Allison Winters0-6, 2-6
2025-09-09vs Watts 2.5W Fall SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Jenifer Checo4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKarin Rochester vs Tia Opyd5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJanice Wuebker vs Allyson Wood4-6, 0-6
2025-09-02vs Hanger 2.5W Fall Singles Tues PMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKarin Rochester vs Caroline Jackson6-3, 6-0
L#3 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Heather Barber0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKarin Rochester vs Allison Chisholm4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Jenna Bialik-Speight0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesTamenika Delgado vs Allison Sharpe7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMeredith Lantz vs Kim Burgess6-1, 7-5
L#3 SinglesLyndsey Grubb vs Kari Faulkner2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.55
Meredith Lantz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.39
Karin Rochester
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.19
Janice Wuebker
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.05
Lyndsey Grubb
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
1.95
Tamenika Delgado
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyndsey Grubb + Janice Wuebker0618% games−14.0% vs expected
Tamenika Delgado + Lyndsey Grubb123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Lantz
19W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karin Rochester
11W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%78%22%
2.39
Janice Wuebker
4W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Lyndsey Grubb
4W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Tamenika Delgado
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.