Teams

Je.Chaffin55M

2026 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-28vs Je.Madia55MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / Holly Moore vs Marti Crane / W Troutman4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Dunn / Judith Gallagher vs Ken Nowell / Jane Williams3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Essary / Janet Sprague vs Jeffrey Madia / Laura Weygandt4-6, 4-6
2026-07-08vs St.Rabby55MWon 21
L#1 DoublesLarry Leins / Judith Gallagher vs Lisa Scott / Ken Glanville2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Sprague / John Dunn vs Dana Weiland / John VanDeWater6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Smith / Sheila Riley vs Michelle Dickson / Scott McElreath7-6, 6-4
2026-07-01vs Re.Procter55MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandra Rhoades / Jeff Chaffin vs Catherine Brawner / Michael Hamlett6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJohn Dunn / Anneliese Carr vs Rebecca Procter / Jack Pyritz6-7, 6-7
2026-06-24vs Je.Monaghen55MWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Moore / Joseph Smith vs Jeffrey Monaghen / LUCY LAV6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Judith Gallagher vs Todd Driscoll / Susan Hembarsky6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLarry Essary / Sandra Rhoades vs Philip Gugliotta / Nancy Gugliotta3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-17vs Te.McKee55MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid McNeill / Holly Moore vs Jason Sage / Juli Korsnack7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRandy Richardson / Sandra Rhoades vs Joe Murphy / Annette Page6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Dunn / Anneliese Carr vs Rhett Hartley / Molly Briggs1-6, 5-7
2026-06-10vs Cr.Schauman55MLost 12
W#1 DoublesLarry Essary / Janet Sprague vs Craig Schauman / Kana Brinckerhoff6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Richardson / Judith Gallagher vs Richard Rambo / Elisabeth Sanchez3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Leins / Holly Moore vs John Whalen / Jeme Avent5-7, 4-6
2026-06-03vs Bi.Francis55MWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Dunn / Janet Sprague vs Charles George / Lesley Knight6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHolly Moore / David McNeill vs Bill Francis / Anna Koltchagova6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPamela McCollum / Joseph Smith vs William Durland / Isabelle Homes Gesher0-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs Ro.Hatlen55MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoseph Smith / Anneliese Carr vs Roger Hatlen / Lori Hatlen6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Leins / Sheila Riley vs Damien Graham / Susana Harvey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeff Chaffin / Sandra Rhoades vs Mark Osborn / Helen Harris3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Je.Madia55M7119516190
2Te.McKee55M7117717191
3St.Rabby55M5315925206
4Cr.Schauman55M53131126220
5Re.Procter55M44101431222
6Je.Chaffin55M35101430238
7Je.Monaghen55M2691534234
8Ro.Hatlen55M2681634244
9Bi.Francis55M1771735254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Larry Leins
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Janet Sprague
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Larry Essary
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Holly Moore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
Jeff Chaffin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
David McNeill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Anneliese Carr
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.34
Sheila Riley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Sandra Rhoades
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Judith Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Pamela McCollum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Moore + David McNeill213 matchesnot enough data
Holly Moore + Jeff Chaffin213 matchesnot enough data
David McNeill + Anneliese Carr123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Larry Leins
62W–114L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Janet Sprague
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Larry Essary
110W–138L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Holly Moore
103W–98L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Jeff Chaffin
77W–121L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
David McNeill
104W–135L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Anneliese Carr
87W–100L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Sheila Riley
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.34
Sandra Rhoades
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Judith Gallagher
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.13
Pamela McCollum
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.