Teams

Marco YMCA - Carley

2023 Collier Mixed 40 & Over Fall · Mixed 40 8.0 Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-10vs Pelican Bay Park - Del RossiLost 02
L#1 DoublesRichard Lewis / Julie Carley vs Jim Garber / Wendy Garber2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTonja Brewer / Chris Brewer vs Christopher Knight / Chrissy Rogers3-6, 3-6
2022-12-04vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Carley / Richard Lewis vs Bernadette DiPino / Bobby Marks2-6, 3-6
2022-12-03vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 20
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kardek / Shirley Steffen vs Rachel Schenk / Luis Benito6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Ball / Richard Lewis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-13vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynne Huggins / Richard Lewis vs LISA AQUINO / Zoltan Seles6-4, 6-6
L#1 DoublesTonja Brewer / Chris Brewer vs Donna Curry / Dan Curry3-6, 4-6
2022-10-29vs Pelican Bay Park - Del RossiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Brewer / Tonja Brewer vs Neal Lewis / Jocelyn Badiu6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRamsay Erickson / Richard Lewis vs Wendy Garber / Jim Garber3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 8.0 Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Tonja Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Lynne Huggins
published
David Ray
published 4
3.73
Julie Walter
published
3.59
Renee Facciola
published 4
3.56
Shirley Steffen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Joseph Kardek
published
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
published
Jennifer Ball
published
Julie Carley
published
Ken Walter
published
Mary Mastrogiacomo
published
Richard Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Stan Britton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Carley + Joseph Kardek1836% gamesnot enough data
Ken Walter + Julie Walter0539% gamesnot enough data
Richard Lewis + Shirley Steffen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tonja Brewer
90W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lynne Huggins
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Ray
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Walter
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Renee Facciola
164W–112L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Shirley Steffen
171W–128L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
Ramsay Erickson
16W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Jennifer Ball
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Carley
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Walter
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Mastrogiacomo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Lewis
118W–158L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stan Britton
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.