Teams

Cl.Duff40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-02vs Ma.Hellner40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesBlake Fricks / Caroline Wall vs Michele Storr / Sharon Horton4-6, 3-6
2025-09-25vs Ch.Hochstrasser40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesMargaret Eller / Parker Rumley vs Garnett Webb / Emily Nelson6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClaire Duff / Caroline Wall vs Leslie Taylor / Heather Hofmann6-1, 6-2
2025-09-11vs Ca.Grimes40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesCaroline Wall / Blake Fricks vs Carole Anne Hussey / Catie Cunningham2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Bean / Parker Rumley vs Carter Grimes / Meghan Richardson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-04vs He.Tuttle40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargaret Eller / Lee Veit vs Lorraine Hall / Heather Tuttle0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCaroline Wall / Meredith Piper vs Jennifer Brock / Lori Elliott5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-28vs Kr.Gilreath40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesParker Rumley / Sarah Newton vs Jaime Clark / Michelle Mills4-6, 5-7
2025-08-21vs La.McRee40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesMargaret Eller / Meredith Piper vs Lisa Maune / Cheri Kivisto2-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs St.Grose40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesClaire Duff / Parker Rumley vs Jennifer Troch / Hope Pflaum7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMeredith Piper / Betsy Gray Barrus vs Connie Haynes / LaDonna Lee2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Lee Veit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Parker Rumley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Libby Stubbs
published
3.05
Margaret Eller
published
3.04
Amy Baker
published 3
3.00
Sarah Newton
published
3.00
Lauren Bean
published
2.98
Caroline Wall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Claire Duff
published 3
Blake Fricks
published 3
2.73
Meredith Piper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Newton + Claire Duff5162% games+1.3% vs expected
Caroline Wall + Margaret Eller314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Wall + Lee Veit213 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Wall + Sarah Newton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lee Veit
83W–73L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Parker Rumley
26W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Libby Stubbs
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Margaret Eller
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Amy Baker
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Sarah Newton
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Lauren Bean
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Caroline Wall
96W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Claire Duff
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Blake Fricks
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Meredith Piper
29W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.