Teams

Jenkins - Penn Pals

2024 Howard Columbia Combo · Howard Columbia Combo 7.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-11-05vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Asher / Lisa Paulman vs Eileen Dietz / Julie Swartz2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne Celtnieks / Mary Shawhan vs Sally Christie / Debra MacDonald4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-27vs OaksmithLost 01
L#3 DoublesMollie Crocker / Nancy Trimble vs Christine Alewine / Elisa Oaksmith3-6, 0-6
2024-10-23vs Lee-Der of the PackLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Shawhan / Jeanne Celtnieks vs Eboni Lance / Leslie Mansfield4-6, 2-6
2024-10-21vs LaMoure - Double TroubleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Shawhan / Mary Klett vs Kelsey Forbes / Linda Tsai3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Paulman / Sydney Anderson vs Amy LaMoure / GENA CHUNG1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Celtnieks / Patricia Jenkins vs Sung Cho / Erin Kim5-7, 3-6
2024-10-17vs Lee-Der of the PackLost 02
L#2 DoublesShalen Fairbanks / Mary Klett vs Karen Robertson / Julie Edwards6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeanne Celtnieks / Margaret Asher vs Quynh Tran / Leslie Mansfield3-6, 0-6
2024-10-15vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Jeanne Celtnieks vs Cintya Leveque / Debra MacDonald0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-09vs OaksmithLost 02
L#1 DoublesShalen Fairbanks / Lisa Paulman vs Stacey Lyons / Madison Simmons2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSydney Anderson / Mary Klett vs Lynn Gorman / Rachael Mott1-6, 3-6
2024-09-22vs OaksmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Shawhan / Elizabeth Amerault vs Brooke Schetgen / Leanne Paranik6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-09-16vs LaMoure - Double TroubleLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Klett / Mary Shawhan vs Katie Tetrault / Kelsey Forbes6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Margaret Asher vs Tricia Muneses / Sung Cho1-6, 4-6
2024-09-13vs Lee-Der of the PackLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Paulman / Mary Klett vs Eboni Lance / Leslie Mansfield0-6, 0-6
2024-09-10vs MacDonald - MacAttack 7.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKristin Stewart Smoot / Jeanne Celtnieks vs Julie Swartz / Eileen Dietz6-7
L#3 DoublesSydney Anderson / Lisa Paulman vs Cintya Leveque / Debra MacDonald0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mary Shawhan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Robin Burton
published
3.54
3.47
Shalen Fairbanks
published
3.38
Denise Buch
published 3.5
3.34
Danielle Gourdine
published 3.5
3.25
Patricia Jenkins
published
3.23
Margaret Asher
published
3.13
Elizabeth Amerault
published
3.11
Mollie Crocker
published
3.05
Jeanne Celtnieks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.01
Mary Klett
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Nancy Trimble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Lisa Paulman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Sydney Anderson
published
Valerie Hicks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Jenkins + Jeanne Celtnieks5747% games−1.9% vs expected
Lisa Paulman + Mary Klett1932% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Celtnieks + Lisa Paulman3353% gamesnot enough data
Mary Shawhan + Jeanne Celtnieks2345% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Trimble + Jeanne Celtnieks134 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Celtnieks + Mary Klett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Shawhan
151W–114L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Robin Burton
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Kristin Stewart Smoot
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Shalen Fairbanks
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Denise Buch
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Danielle Gourdine
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Patricia Jenkins
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Margaret Asher
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Elizabeth Amerault
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Mollie Crocker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jeanne Celtnieks
66W–108L career · 6 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Mary Klett
47W–85L career · 9 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 3 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Lisa Paulman
85W–156L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Sydney Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Hicks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.