Teams

Melis - Loudoun Lobsters

2025 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-27vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrice Haspil / Dante Paragas vs James Cheong / Scott Hataway2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-21vs Rentsch- ChallengersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDante Paragas / Patrice Haspil vs Anup Dandekar / Bruce Henshel5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-07-10vs Rentsch- ChallengersWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmit Kumar Jha / Hung Le vs Ben Moss / Frank Pan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Trimboli / Patrice Haspil vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-02vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaul Ebersole / Adam Briggs vs Vijay Kalanadhabhatta / Jose Ricardo Cornista6-7, 1-6
2025-06-30vs Rentsch- ChallengersWon 20
W#1 DoublesHung Le / Amit Kumar Jha vs Jeff Bolyard / Ron Haimowitz6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Trimboli / Dante Paragas vs Michael Porturica / Ben Moss6-4, 6-1
2025-06-24vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesSanthosh Potti / Jordan Citron vs Simon Storm / Jason Pallady3-6, 5-5
L#2 DoublesPaul Joseph / Hung Le vs Joel Velasquez / Andrew Schmidt1-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs Rentsch- ChallengersWon 20
W#2 DoublesHung Le / William Melis vs Justin Garza / John Sobieray6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSanthosh Potti / Matthew Trimboli vs James Rentsch / Michael Porturica6-2, 6-1
2025-06-02vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersWon 20
W#2 DoublesSanthosh Potti / Paul Joseph vs Viswas Pola / Vishnu Chunduru6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDante Paragas / Patrice Haspil vs Freddy Feliz / Doan Nguyen6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Santhosh Potti
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Paul Ebersole
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Hung Le
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Dante Paragas
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Adam Briggs
published 3.5
3.14
Matthew Trimboli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patrice Haspil
published
Praveen Mullacherry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Trimboli + Santhosh Potti314 matchesnot enough data
Adam Briggs + Hung Le213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Santhosh Potti
41W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Paul Ebersole
45W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Hung Le
44W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Dante Paragas
72W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Adam Briggs
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Matthew Trimboli
119W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Patrice Haspil
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Praveen Mullacherry
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.