Teams

Johnston/Team Johnston

2025 Adult 18 2.5 Outdoors Social · 2.5W

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-23vs Reyes-Teach/Court QueensLost 01
L#1 DoublesDevin Schwent / Kathryn Fleddermann vs Bisiayo Fashemi / Shruthi Iyer2-6, 4-6
2025-06-28vs Reyes-Teach/Court QueensLost 01
L#1 DoublesAudrey Leonard / Maria Roudnev vs Ashley Dimercurio / Soledad Van Emden4-6, 5-7
2025-05-31vs Pearlman-Jacobs/Net NinjasWon 20
W#1 DoublesDevin Schwent / Audrey Leonard vs Nicole Armstrong / Ramona Behshad6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaisy Chen / Emily Johnston vs Emily Danforth / Becky Kovarik6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-24vs Horsford/Yes We CanWon 20
W#1 DoublesDevin Schwent / Emily Johnston vs Valerie Nelson Mason / Kayla Sgambelluri6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDaisy Chen / Rebecca Hare vs Pamela Chatman / Ivy Alwell7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Reyes-Teach/Court QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesAudrey Leonard / Devin Schwent vs Shruthi Iyer / Soledad Van Emden6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDaisy Chen vs Ashley Dimercurio6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Hare / Capella Sagastume vs Tracy Duggins / Lori Fisk1-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs Horsford/Yes We CanWon 30
W#1 DoublesDevin Schwent / Capella Sagastume vs Erricca Danyell / Kayla Sgambelluri6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDaisy Chen vs Pamela Chatman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Leonard / Kathryn Fleddermann vs Yashica Bryant / Imani Harris6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Reyes-Teach/Court Queens8324919156
2Johnston/Team Johnston5212920138
3Horsford/Yes We Can1551328177
4Pearlman-Jacobs/Net Ninjas0401224137

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Audrey Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.45
Devin Schwent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Emily Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Daisy Chen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.00
Capella Sagastume
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.97
Rebecca Hare
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Fleddermann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maria Roudnev
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Audrey Leonard
5W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Devin Schwent
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Emily Johnston
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
2.5
Daisy Chen
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Capella Sagastume
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Rebecca Hare
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Kathryn Fleddermann
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Roudnev
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.