Teams

MC GOLD

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-08vs CCC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesTara Cronin / Kelly Sengenberger vs Leesa Blanding / Lori Cerise1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Spiwak / Jillian Clark vs Tonya Rasmussen / Katie Duncan4-6, 6-7
2022-08-25vs GR GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Wilson / Samantha Spiwak vs Nicole Bartet / Cassie Urban6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Sengenberger / Tara Cronin vs Abby Letourneau / Ashley Busch4-6, 1-6
2022-08-24vs BCST GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTara Cronin / Kelly Brewster vs Patty Archuleta / Kathy Williams6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Sengenberger / Jillian Clark vs Stephanie Passarelli / Colleen Callahan0-6, 4-6
2022-08-11vs KC TEALSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTara Cronin / Kelly Sengenberger vs Sarah Franzen / Rachel Osborne5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKelly Brewster / Jillian Clark vs Ruth Wilken / Kelly Zibell7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-04vs KC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesKelly Brewster / Samantha Spiwak vs Sandra Copenhaver / Christine Jacquet6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMeghan Ciacci vs Annamaria Augustine4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJillian Clark / Tara Cronin vs Lara Howe / Magdalena Smith1-6, 4-6
2022-07-28vs BM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeghan Ciacci / Kelly Brewster vs Sarah Chapman / Kristiane Lucas6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Sengenberger / Tara Cronin vs Dina Burgess / Leah Putnam6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Kelly Brewster
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Meghan Ciacci
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.33
Jillian Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Tara Cronin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.15
Samantha Spiwak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.98
Kelly Sengenberger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Cronin + Kelly Sengenberger141349% games+0.9% vs expected
Samantha Spiwak + Kelly Sengenberger044 matchesnot enough data
Jillian Clark + Tara Cronin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kelly Brewster
46W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Meghan Ciacci
72W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Jillian Clark
46W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%91%9%
2.33
Tara Cronin
31W–38L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Samantha Spiwak
45W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Kelly Sengenberger
21W–83L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.