Teams

Hog Mountain-Bart

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Katharine Magahey
published
4.05
Shelly Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.02
Kimberlie W Ensley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.91
Kristan Stroner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.89
Karen Bart
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.84
Nancy Tate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.79
Kay Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Andrea del Valle
published 4
3.73
Joanna Stephenson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.73
Ashley Gannon
published 4
3.72
Jane Myers
published
3.69
Jaime Christian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
3.68
Cheryl Russell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.66
Cindy Latouf
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Kim Beasley
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Lazonia Jordan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharine Magahey + Kay Forrest7173% games+9.8% vs expected
Jaime Christian + Kristan Stroner8072% games+7.7% vs expected
Karen Bart + Kimberlie W Ensley5356% games+5.3% vs expected
Kristan Stroner + Nancy Tate12266% games+4.0% vs expected
Karen Bart + Shelly Hunt14462% games+1.5% vs expected
Jaime Christian + Nancy Tate2346% games−0.5% vs expected
Cheryl Russell + Kay Forrest5356% games−1.7% vs expected
Cheryl Russell + Katharine Magahey4259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katharine Magahey
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
4.10
Shelly Hunt
41W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Kimberlie W Ensley
60W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Kristan Stroner
40W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Karen Bart
35W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Nancy Tate
63W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Kay Forrest
23W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Andrea del Valle
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Catherine Meadows
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanna Stephenson
39W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ashley Gannon
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jane Myers
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Jaime Christian
67W–66L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Cheryl Russell
40W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Cindy Latouf
8W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Kim Beasley
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Lazonia Jordan
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.