Teams

GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Heras/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesMara Huerta / Sophia De La Parra vs Taryn Hunt / Erica Sheid6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesPaola Rojas Miranda / Mara Huerta vs Georgina Garcia / Paola Sanchez6-1, 6-1
2026-04-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesMara Huerta vs AYLEEN PACE6-0, 6-0
2026-04-13vs GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/McCarthy/EPTC#2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSophia De La Parra / Mara Huerta vs Freneci Silva / Monica Bordagaray4-6, 1-6
2026-03-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesMara Huerta vs Norma Alvarado6-1, 6-1
2026-03-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnayancy Roldan / Mara Huerta vs Corinne Shepherd / Magdlyn St-Cyr6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Carolina Adame
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.49
Anayancy Roldan
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.13
Ana Krystel Heras
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Mara Huerta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Megan Walia
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
Montzerrat Alvarado
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Nicolette Felhaber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Paola Rojas Miranda
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Paulina Salem
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Perla Carrillo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sophia De La Parra
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paola Rojas Miranda + Carolina Adame3741% gamesnot enough data
Paola Rojas Miranda + Megan Walia123 matchesnot enough data
Anayancy Roldan + Sophia De La Parra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Carolina Adame
11W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.58
2.5
Anayancy Roldan
16W–14L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Ana Krystel Heras
3W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Mara Huerta
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Walia
6W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Montzerrat Alvarado
3W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicolette Felhaber
1W–10L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paola Rojas Miranda
16W–28L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paulina Salem
2W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Perla Carrillo
15W–24L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sophia De La Parra
12W–13L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.