Teams

WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Sager

2026 WI Other · WI Low Tri Summer Singles Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · WI Low Tri Summer Singles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Isensee93241229232
2WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Akyuz93231330249
3WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Nicholas84221433271
4WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Sager57171941307
5WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Masrour48112554364
6WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Cusack38102347318
7WI Low Tri M Summer Singles MALT Sendelbach2992449345

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Jeremy Sager
usually #3 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.19
Timur Mavlyutov
usually #2 Singles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Brian Katz
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Sager
34W–38L career · 9 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Timur Mavlyutov
61W–101L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3
Brian Katz
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.