Teams

MPRC-Gates

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.54 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
David Hoiland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.54
John Yu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Eric Halvorson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Jim DeWeese
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeffrey Gates
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Benjamin Moore
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Jeff Anhaltzer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Jeff Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Ron Press
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Dan Wolff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Tommy Atkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Peter Casey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
David Hoiland
135W–59L career
0%100%0%
3.77
4
John Yu
136W–64L career
22%78%0%
3.54
3.5
Eric Halvorson
67W–52L career
0%80%20%
3.47
3.5
Jim DeWeese
89W–73L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Jeffrey Gates
101W–93L career
0%99%1%
3.32
3.5
Benjamin Moore
13W–12L career
2%93%5%
3.31
3.5
Jeff Anhaltzer
90W–97L career
0%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Jeff Marshall
45W–60L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Ron Press
40W–41L career
2%98%0%
3.20
3.5
Dan Wolff
25W–51L career
12%88%1%
3.16
3.5
Tommy Atkins
22W–53L career
14%86%0%
3.10
3
Peter Casey
23W–22L career
1%77%22%
2.94

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.