Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Day

2022 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-17vs Liberty Park Tennis-BellinaLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesCatherine van Uitert / Aja-Lynn Domingo vs Kirsten Lewis / Stephanie Benton3-6, 1-6
L#3 Female DoublesMelanie Decker / Lori Wilson vs Madelyn Totland / Katie Leikin1-6, 1-6
2022-12-10Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / Amanda Moore vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-12-10vs Sports Mall-Henderson/BrownLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesMolly Adams / Catherine van Uitert vs Stacy Criddle / Amber Thompson3-6, 2-6
2022-12-03vs Liberty Park Tennis-Taylor/KnightLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / Britney Klaetsch vs Annette Knight / Alena Taylor4-6, 3-2, 1-0
W#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / Maria Pettit vs Lili Leiataua Iosefa / LaNece Andreason2-6, 4-3, 1-0
2022-11-19Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / Molly Adams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-19vs Liberty Park Tennis-GoreyLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesJaNean Nelson / Elaine Day vs Mandy Berg / Jessika Brown6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / JaNean Nelson vs Simone McInnis / Christina Eischeid0-6, 1-6
2022-11-12vs Cottonwood Club-Annunziata/SimmonsLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesElaine Day / Catherine van Uitert vs Mindi Paskins / Maria Lombardi1-6, 3-6
2022-11-05vs Liberty Park Tennis-Hurd/MaxfieldLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / Diane Poole vs Manal Hall / JaNean Nelson4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Emilee Hurley
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Kassie Torres
usually #1 Female Doubles 44%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Catherine van Uitert
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Weddington
published
3.03
Diane Poole
usually #3 Female Doubles 33%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Lori Wilson
published
2.93
Rikke Phinney
published
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Harman
published
Aja-Lynn Domingo
published 3
2.64
Elaine Day
usually #3 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 13% · published 3
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Molly Adams
published
Sophie Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Adams + Kassie Torres7355% games+11.8% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Molly Adams7352% games+6.9% vs expected
Elaine Day + Kassie Torres4252% games+2.6% vs expected
Lori Wilson + Rebecca Harman41641% games+1.2% vs expected
Rikke Phinney + Melanie Decker3442% games+1.1% vs expected
Elaine Day + Catherine van Uitert2544% games−1.4% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Maria Pettit61145% games−2.6% vs expected
Elaine Day + Maria Pettit4449% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emilee Hurley
96W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Kassie Torres
180W–119L career · 9 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Catherine van Uitert
50W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Michelle Weddington
57W–43L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Diane Poole
191W–165L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Lori Wilson
71W–153L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Rikke Phinney
44W–49L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Aja-Lynn Domingo
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elaine Day
124W–248L career · 8 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 1 line in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42
Molly Adams
83W–53L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sophie Jackson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.