KTC-Coffman

2022 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2022 Winter A18&O 3.5 Women Weekend

22 players · average NTRP 3.20 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings10 teams · 2022 Winter A18&O 3.5 Women Weekend

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1FSSC-Day	11	0	45	10	29	354
2SRTC-Wilkins	8	3	36	19	52	429
3STC-LaPole	7	4	26	29	63	488
4KTC-Phillips	5	6	25	30	66	472
5STC-Brown	4	7	25	30	69	518
6KTC-Wu	4	7	24	31	70	529
7KTC-Coffman	4	7	24	31	71	528
8FSSC-McDougall	4	7	21	34	79	547
9QRRC-Augustine	2	9	19	36	83	577
10KTC-Gustafson	2	9	13	42	87	582

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42

Kathy Bleidorn

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published —

3.22

Kylie Kayser

published —

3.20

Robyn Bittner

published —

3.19

Maria Lofty

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published —

3.18

Elizabeth Wendling

published 3.5

3.16

Marybeth Kunst

published —

3.15

Tami Stout

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

3.03

Abby Sliemers

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.01

Lara Schmitz

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —

2.99

Karen Coffman

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published —

2.97

Julie Wolters

published —

2.94

Tracey Trombetta

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

2.87

Susan Warden

published —

2.83

Penney Bentley

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Ashley Nichols

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3

—

Cheri Carter

usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3

—

Diane Schell

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3

—

Katelyn Abney

published —

—

Kendra Roth

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Rebecca Gulden

published —

—

Terri Stark

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

—

Vicky Hoffman

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penney Bentley + Abby Sliemers	7–2	54% games	+12.5% vs expected
Abby Sliemers + Tami Stout	3–4	51% games	+7.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Wendling + Robyn Bittner	5–3	54% games	+6.5% vs expected
Lara Schmitz + Maria Lofty	5–2	55% games	+5.5% vs expected
Karen Coffman + Kathy Bleidorn	13–8	50% games	+1.7% vs expected
Karen Coffman + Lara Schmitz	2–15	37% games	+1.1% vs expected
Karen Coffman + Elizabeth Wendling	11–9	45% games	+0.2% vs expected
Marybeth Kunst + Robyn Bittner	19–15	53% games	−2.0% vs expected

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Kathy Bleidorn

136W–152L career · 6 lines in 2022

<1%73%27%

3.42

—

Kylie Kayser

15W–23L career · no lines in 2022

4%94%2%

3.22

—

Robyn Bittner

57W–47L career · no lines in 2022

6%93%1%

3.20

—

Maria Lofty

63W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022

7%92%1%

3.19

3.5

Elizabeth Wendling

51W–33L career · no lines in 2022

9%91%1%

3.18

—

Marybeth Kunst

25W–20L career · no lines in 2022

10%89%<1%

3.16

—

Tami Stout

82W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022

13%86%<1%

3.15

3.5

Abby Sliemers

38W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022

40%60%<1%

3.03

—

Lara Schmitz

76W–104L career · 3 lines in 2022

47%53%<1%

3.01

—

Karen Coffman

86W–152L career · 6 lines in 2022

53%47%<1%

2.99

—

Julie Wolters

26W–36L career · no lines in 2022

58%42%<1%

2.97

—

Tracey Trombetta

50W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022

<1%69%31%

2.94

—

Susan Warden

35W–62L career · no lines in 2022

<1%84%16%

2.87

—

Penney Bentley

59W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022

<1%89%10%

2.83

Ashley Nichols

14W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Cheri Carter

19W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Diane Schell

43W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Katelyn Abney

2W–14L career · no lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Kendra Roth

83W–81L career · 4 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Rebecca Gulden

15W–27L career · no lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Terri Stark

16W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022

not enough data

—

Vicky Hoffman

26W–23L career · 1 line in 2022

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.