Teams

Yung-Okamoto/Nashville

2025 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - SAT 1:00 pm

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-05vs McRae/Bright/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrances Martin / Stacy Miller vs Lisa Beasley / Lee Oakley6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristie Skoda / Rebecca Bourlakas vs Kim McRae / Kim Bright5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeena Choi / Pat Yung-Okamoto vs Tracey Williamson / Allison Braswell6-1, 6-3
2025-03-01vs Frye/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrances Martin / Stacy Miller vs Kelly Bennie / Dodson Randolph6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Eckhart / Jennifer Knight vs Susan Manley / Lesly Todesco6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Bourlakas / Sue Anne Perry vs Dewanda Carbine / Marian Vangeli7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - SAT 1:00 pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Brenda Eckhart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Stacy Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Frances Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
LIsa Robinson
published
3.34
Jennifer Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Sally Goodrich
published
3.33
Leena Choi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Barbara Tempkins
published 3.5
3.32
Julie Carpenter
published
3.28
Pat Yung-Okamoto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Betty Tudor
published 3.5
3.25
Sue Anne Perry
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Kristie Skoda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Rebecca Bourlakas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Knight + Brenda Eckhart7453% games+12.8% vs expected
Leena Choi + Pat Yung-Okamoto3249% gamesnot enough data
Sue Anne Perry + Kristie Skoda224 matchesnot enough data
Sally Goodrich + Julie Carpenter314 matchesnot enough data
Frances Martin + Stacy Miller404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Eckhart
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
Stacy Miller
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Frances Martin
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
LIsa Robinson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Jennifer Knight
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Sally Goodrich
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Leena Choi
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Barbara Tempkins
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Julie Carpenter
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Pat Yung-Okamoto
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Betty Tudor
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Sue Anne Perry
20W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Kristie Skoda
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Rebecca Bourlakas
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.