Teams

AlleyCats

2025 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 4.0 Women Monday

17 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-24vs YMCA 4.0 Monday PichotWon 30
W#1 DoublesDorothy Basso / Marnie Simpson vs Fernanda Aguilar / Angela Penrod7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDianne Littleton / Chaney Stuart vs Alejandra Perales / Claudia Palacios6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Matthews / SARA SHARPE vs Jane Pelley / Norma Trevino2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
3.90
Jenevieve Zoch
published
3.83
Carlisle Swann
published 4
Alice Adair
published 4
Catherine Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Courtney Simons
published 4
Dianne Littleton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Dorothy Basso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Marnie Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Allison Hayne
published 4
3.62
SARA SHARPE
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Chaney Stuart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Joy Fuhrmann
published
3.40
Ann Cross
published 3.5
3.34
Anne Seay
published 3.5
Meredith Brewer
published
Sugar Barnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marnie Simpson + Dorothy Basso3348% games−3.7% vs expected
Allison Hayne + Annabelle Thaddeus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annabelle Thaddeus
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
Jenevieve Zoch
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Carlisle Swann
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Alice Adair
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Catherine Matthews
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Courtney Simons
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dianne Littleton
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Dorothy Basso
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Marnie Simpson
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Allison Hayne
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
SARA SHARPE
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Chaney Stuart
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Joy Fuhrmann
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ann Cross
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Anne Seay
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Meredith Brewer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sugar Barnes
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.