Teams

Sabio - SpaceBalls

2025 Hampton Roads Tri-Level · Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-25vs Deleon - SUPREMEWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Conde / Rogelio Valdez vs Dillon Bradshaw / Andre Rogers6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Conde / David Nekoumand vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-06vs Williams - Triple TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesShaun Sabio / Rogelio Valdez vs Justin Pierce / Cheng Tung6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-17vs Deleon - SUPREMEWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Nekoumand / Shaun Sabio vs Dillon Bradshaw / Andre Rogers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-07vs BraceyLost 01
L#1 DoublesShaun Sabio / Patrick Conde vs James Bracey / Shunsuke Araki4-6, 4-6
2025-07-31vs Williams - Triple TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Conde / David Nekoumand vs Justin Pierce / Cheng Tung6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
David Nekoumand
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Patrick Conde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Rogelio Valdez
published
3.71
Shaun Sabio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Roland Nave
published
3.34
Monte Lehmkuhler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Renald Castro
published
3.23
Joe Valdez
published
3.00
Joseph Cicero
published
Bobby Abuel
published 3
Jason Walters
published
Jonathan Concio
published
Miguel Dela Cruz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roland Nave + Renald Castro5458% games+4.0% vs expected
Shaun Sabio + Patrick Conde6257% gamesnot enough data
David Nekoumand + Patrick Conde213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Nekoumand
95W–33L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Patrick Conde
42W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.85
Rogelio Valdez
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Shaun Sabio
52W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Roland Nave
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Monte Lehmkuhler
85W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
Renald Castro
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Joe Valdez
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Joseph Cicero
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Bobby Abuel
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Walters
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Concio
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Miguel Dela Cruz
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.