Teams

SATLC55/RPRINCE/MCMILLANPARK

USTA Combo 55 & Over · Women - 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27vs SATL55/Barry-Moore/YMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudson McNeil / Cathy Brinegar vs Vicky Bagwell / Rosemary Calicutt6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVanessa Durrah / Amy Eskew vs Renee Moore / Natalie Barry2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesApril Barber / Melissa Coles vs Karen McBride / Roberta Heinrich7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs SATL55/Barry-Moore/YMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesVanessa Durrah / Amy Eskew vs Vicky Bagwell / Francine Gelinas6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesApril Barber / Catherine Hunt vs Susan Hood / Roberta Heinrich6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBecky Lance / Cathy Brinegar vs Susan J Vollmer / Rosemary Calicutt6-2, 6-4
2026-08-13vs SATL55/Barry-Moore/YMCALost 12
W#1 DoublesEdie Clator / April Barber vs Mary Alice Corso / Patty Bersaglia-Wilds6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCathy Brinegar / MADHAVI KAMIREDDI vs Natalie Barry / Karen McBride2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAmy Eskew / Rhonda Prince vs TLynn Gilpin / Vicky Bagwell5-7, 3-6
2026-08-06vs SATL55/Barry-Moore/YMCAWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Burton Kelley / MADHAVI KAMIREDDI vs Jane Krason / Karen McBride4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Emoff / April Barber vs Mary Alice Corso / Vicky Bagwell6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Brinegar / Vanessa Durrah vs Natalie Barry / Renee Moore6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Edie Clator
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Deb Manning
published 3.5
3.35
Sandra Burton Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Cathy Brinegar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Amy Eskew
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Teri O'Reilly
published
3.25
Kelly Emoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine Hunt
published 3.5
3.22
Melissa Coles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Judson McNeil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
MADHAVI KAMIREDDI
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Rhonda Prince
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Lori Napper
published
2.83
Becky Lance
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
April Barber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Vanessa Durrah
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Eskew + Cathy Brinegar10267% games+8.1% vs expected
Rhonda Prince + Edie Clator6254% games−10.3% vs expected
Judson McNeil + Becky Lance5163% gamesnot enough data
Amy Eskew + Vanessa Durrah5060% gamesnot enough data
Amy Eskew + Rhonda Prince224 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Prince + Cathy Brinegar224 matchesnot enough data
Teri O'Reilly + Sandra Burton Kelley224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Coles + Kelly Emoff303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edie Clator
42W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Deb Manning
22W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Sandra Burton Kelley
39W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Cathy Brinegar
29W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amy Eskew
29W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Teri O'Reilly
10W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kelly Emoff
61W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Catherine Hunt
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Judson McNeil
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
MADHAVI KAMIREDDI
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Rhonda Prince
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Lori Napper
13W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Becky Lance
26W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
April Barber
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Vanessa Durrah
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.