Teams

Overserved

2023 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20vs Stingrays 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Miller / Joshua Sadler vs Dan Albrecht / Sean Balser7-6, 6-2
2023-06-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMax Levine / Michael Vanderputten vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-13vs Stingrays 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeet Sandhu / Michael Vanderputten vs Daniel Spinelli / Carl Strozyk6-3, 6-1
2023-06-04vs Stingrays 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Sadler / Joe Stafford vs Daniel Bryant / Fulvio Domenicali6-0, 6-4
2023-05-25vs Misshit WinnersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeet Sandhu / Michael Vanderputten vs George Sybert / Brooks Thacker7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark DiBiagio / Joshua Sadler vs J Blue / Kevin Foehrkolb6-4, 6-2
2023-05-15vs Misshit WinnersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Black / Joshua Sadler vs George Sybert / Joe Deleon5-7, 3-6
2023-04-23vs Misshit WinnersWon 20
W#1 DoublesDerek Black / Jeet Sandhu vs Kevin Foehrkolb / David Kraus6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChris Miller / Joshua Sadler vs Jonathan Butkus / Gregg Eller6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Michael Vanderputten
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Jeet Sandhu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Joshua Sadler
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Chris Miller
published 3.5
Jim Slaughter
published
Phineas Deford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Sadler + Jeet Sandhu404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Vanderputten + Jeet Sandhu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Vanderputten
224W–139L career · 3 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Jeet Sandhu
108W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Joshua Sadler
126W–94L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Chris Miller
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Slaughter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Phineas Deford
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.