Teams

Upchurch/Arnold - Longview HS

2025 NETX Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-13vs Hooks/Tankersley - FaulknerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLauren Arnold / Debra Richardson vs Yvette Brunette / Shawna Tankersley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCandace Couch vs Kimberly Henry6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBecky Berry / Holly Hamilton vs Judy Hooks / Jo Ann Compton6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSushama Brimmer / Veena Reddy vs Dayna Mayer / Lesley Manuel4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-27vs Whitus/Blair -TASCWon 40
W#1 DoublesCheryl Upchurch / MARGARET WRIGHT vs Cindy Behm / Camille Becton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTami Bitting vs Monica Hudspeth6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Richardson / Kristi Roberson vs Sharyn McElmurry / Meg Robertson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTricia Courtright / Candace Couch vs Lauren Whitus / Chesle Blair6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-20vs Hooks/Tankersley - FaulknerWon 31
L#1 DoublesCheryl Upchurch / Candace Couch vs Shawna Tankersley / Cici Shelton3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMARGARET WRIGHT vs Diana Norwood7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBecky Berry / Tami Bitting vs Jo Ann Compton / Jennifer Green7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVeena Reddy / Sushama Brimmer vs Dina Heithoff / Snizhana Zhdanova6-4, 6-4
2025-02-06vs Whitus/Blair -TASCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTricia Courtright / Tiffany Porter vs Meg Robertson / Lauren Whitus6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Arnold vs Callie Morton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Upchurch / Debra Richardson vs Aileen Francisco / Morgan Spicer4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSushama Brimmer / MARGARET WRIGHT vs Lacy Mattek / Cheryl Pierce3-6, 2-6
2025-02-05vs Hooks/Tankersley - FaulknerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Upchurch / Debra Richardson vs Shawna Tankersley / Jennifer Green6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTami Bitting / Sushama Brimmer vs Dayna Mayer / Lesley Manuel6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBecky Berry / Holly Hamilton vs Diana Norwood / Snizhana Zhdanova6-3, 7-5
2025-01-16vs Whitus/Blair -TASCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTiffany Porter / Tricia Courtright vs Sharyn McElmurry / Camille Becton7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Arnold vs Monica Hudspeth6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristi Roberson / Tami Bitting vs Callie Morton / Lauren Whitus0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDebra Richardson / Cheryl Upchurch vs Chesle Blair / Morgan Spicer6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Lauren Arnold
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Becky Berry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
MARGARET WRIGHT
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.65
Tami Bitting
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.65
Candace Couch
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Tricia Courtright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Cheryl Upchurch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.45
Debra Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.37
Sushama Brimmer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Veena Reddy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristi Roberson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Porter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veena Reddy + Sushama Brimmer2741% games+14.4% vs expected
Cheryl Upchurch + Debra Richardson101546% games−12.2% vs expected
Cheryl Upchurch + Tricia Courtright224 matchesnot enough data
Tami Bitting + Debra Richardson123 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Roberson + Debra Richardson213 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Courtright + Candace Couch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Arnold
28W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Becky Berry
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
MARGARET WRIGHT
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Tami Bitting
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Candace Couch
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Tricia Courtright
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cheryl Upchurch
20W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Debra Richardson
21W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Sushama Brimmer
7W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Veena Reddy
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.21
Kristi Roberson
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Porter
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.