Teams

SVB - D. Lynham

2025 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over Men · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesEddie Collins / Johnny Fung vs Kalicharan Durgampudi / Matthew Hayes6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Diamond / Brian Mitchell vs Todd Abrams / Kenneth Sallings6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCharles Constantine / Brandon Halm vs Peter Martino / Ken Patrick6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesCharles Constantine / Brandon Halm vs Andrew Busby / Ken Patrick6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Mitchell / Johnny Fung vs Matthew Hayes / Ranjit Singh3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoey Campbell / Todd Vandeberg vs Todd Abrams / Matthew David6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Joey Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
William Diamond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Chad Paluzzi
published 4
3.71
Siwei Jin
published
3.68
Ronald March
published
3.68
Eddie Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Charles Constantine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Shashikiran Suresh
published
3.63
DENIS LYNHAM
published 4
3.61
Johnny Fung
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Brandon Halm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Todd Vandeberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Owen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronald March + Joey Campbell3746% games−1.8% vs expected
Joey Campbell + Johnny Fung1442% games−7.1% vs expected
Shashikiran Suresh + Chad Paluzzi1440% gamesnot enough data
Siwei Jin + Eddie Collins314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joey Campbell
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
William Diamond
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Chad Paluzzi
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Siwei Jin
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Ronald March
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Charles Constantine
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Shashikiran Suresh
30W–34L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
DENIS LYNHAM
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Johnny Fung
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
3.5
Brandon Halm
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Todd Vandeberg
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Todd Owen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.