Teams

Challengers

2025 Mixed 18 and Over League · 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.18 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-13vs Screw BallsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMona Decrinis / Brad Helman vs Nate Geigle / Lena Poonnopatam2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Kevin Hillman vs Hana Yoshikawa / Manaolana Kaiwi7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEmily Collins / Charlie Crandall vs Sae Hyun Song / Rachel Karlin2-6, 3-6
2025-04-13vs Screw BallsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hall / Chan Ly vs Malorie Murakami / Justin Locke2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRick Kepler / Brooke von Tempsky vs Mark Tristan Virgino / Lena Poonnopatam6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRachel Christopher / Austin Wines vs Sae Hyun Song / Berylin Lau4-6, 4-6
2025-03-29vs Screw BallsLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrooke von Tempsky / Rick Kepler vs Steven Nguyen / Rachel Karlin7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hall / Chan Ly vs Hana Yoshikawa / Mark Tristan Virgino6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMona Decrinis / Charlie Crandall vs Malorie Murakami / Andrew Yoon3-6, 2-6
2025-03-23vs Screw BallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hall / Chan Ly vs Hana Yoshikawa / Andrew Yoon3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeb Rinaldi / Austin Wines vs Nate Geigle / Jennifer Wood1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Brad Helman vs Justin Locke / Berylin Lau2-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs Screw BallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesRachel Christopher / Kevin Hillman vs Steven Nguyen / Rachel Karlin3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMona Decrinis / Austin Wines vs Jennifer Wood / Manaolana Kaiwi4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Collins / Tetsu Anan vs Malorie Murakami / Mark Tristan Virgino4-6, 2-6
2025-03-16vs Screw BallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeb Rinaldi / Brad Helman vs Malorie Murakami / Manaolana Kaiwi6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Christopher / Kevin Hillman vs Jennifer Wood / Justin Locke6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAustin Wines / Emily Collins vs Nate Geigle / Lena Poonnopatam4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Challengers0631530203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Chan Ly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
Deb Rinaldi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.14
Charlie Crandall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.09
Rachel Christopher
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Brad Helman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.92
Austin Wines
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Karen Sullivan
published
3.89
Jill Kanahele
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.84
Kevin Hillman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Mona Decrinis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Brooke von Tempsky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Catherine Hall
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.30
Emily Collins
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Rick Kepler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tetsu Anan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Kanahele + Brad Helman5071% games+9.0% vs expected
Brooke von Tempsky + Rick Kepler6063% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Hall + Chan Ly0633% gamesnot enough data
Mona Decrinis + Charlie Crandall134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chan Ly
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Deb Rinaldi
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
4.35
4
Charlie Crandall
52W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
4.14
4.5
Rachel Christopher
69W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
4.09
4
Brad Helman
66W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Austin Wines
16W–9L career · type S · 8 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Karen Sullivan
37W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Jill Kanahele
252W–166L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Kevin Hillman
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Mona Decrinis
103W–125L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brooke von Tempsky
58W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Catherine Hall
144W–172L career · 11 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
4.5
Emily Collins
48W–31L career · 12 lines in 2025
>99%<1%0%
3.30
Rick Kepler
21W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tetsu Anan
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.