Teams

DCC LISTI

2023 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-14vs RID PEEDERSLost 01
L#1 DoublesGena Edwards / Jennifer Burns vs Sophie Kriss / Ashley Peeders4-6, 3-6
2023-04-05vs BW KYRISHWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Burns / Gena Edwards vs Danica Brown / Lucy Huff6-3, 6-2
2023-03-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesGena Edwards / Jennifer Burns vs Samantha Roberson / Sarah Houston6-4, 6-3
2023-03-22vs STC RHODESLost 01
L#2 DoublesGena Edwards / Jennifer Burns vs Linda Ergas / Jessica Gaudin5-7, 4-6
2023-03-10vs RC CAGLE/LEWISLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Trapnell / Jennifer Burns vs Sonya Tanna / Paige Cooper2-6, 2-6
2023-03-03vs TRO WESTWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Burns / Gena Edwards vs Justine Hollinsworth / Noel Cottrell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Danielle Andrus
published 3.5
3.04
Shana Lopez
published
3.00
Linda Lapointe
published
2.99
Michelle Andrus
published
2.91
Cheryl Listi
published 3
2.66
Gena Edwards
published 3
2.57
Jennifer Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Lynn Fields
published
Patricia Trapnell
published
Sandi Draper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Burns + Gena Edwards0527% games−16.2% vs expected
Jennifer Burns + Michelle Andrus213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Lapointe + Cheryl Listi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Andrus
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
Shana Lopez
22W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Linda Lapointe
50W–53L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
Michelle Andrus
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Cheryl Listi
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Gena Edwards
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Jennifer Burns
41W–53L career · 6 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.57
Lynn Fields
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Trapnell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandi Draper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.