Teams

Champion/Dellinger

2025 EVTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Winter '24 · Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-14vs EVTA/Heather EllingtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Hale / Jan Lamier vs Kay Henderson / Dana Kubow6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTina Waggoner / Avis King vs Janet Lovelady / Barbara Johnson1-6, 6-7
2024-12-07vs EVTA/Heather EllingtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Hale / Jan Lamier vs Marsha Turner / Dana Kubow6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeresa Coone / Karen Russell vs Ann Carroll / Cami Marcus5-7, 1-6
2024-11-23vs EVTA/Heather EllingtonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngela Hale / Teresa Coone vs Barbara Johnson / Lelia MacKey6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMartha Millican / Karlene Welty vs Heather Ellington / Denise Smith4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Russell / Tina Waggoner vs Ann Carroll / Cami Marcus1-6, 1-6
2024-11-16vs EVTA/Heather EllingtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Millican / Angela Hale vs Holly Williams / Kay Henderson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJan Lamier / Tina Waggoner vs Cami Marcus / Janet Lovelady4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-09vs EVTA/Heather EllingtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Coone / Angela Hale vs Dana Kubow / Holly Williams6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAvis King / Karlene Welty vs Ann Carroll / Denise Smith4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EVTA/Heather Ellington50132894
2Champion/Dellinger0521326152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Karlene Welty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Avis King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Martha Millican
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Teresa Coone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.00
Tina Waggoner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Brenda Champion
published
Jan Lamier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karlene Welty
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Avis King
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Millican
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Teresa Coone
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Tina Waggoner
2W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Brenda Champion
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jan Lamier
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.