Teams

MatchPoint/DavidPark/Pol

2025 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-02-25vs Pompano/FlanschaLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarlos Navarro / John Cogan vs Nick Flanscha / David Aizer3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMartin Pollon vs Jason Gaul0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMarcelo Melnitzky / Andres Rosenfeld vs Herman Samson / Brian Kares6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-18vs Broward/Newman/40&Over4.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesHernando Gonzalez / Carlos Navarro vs Paul Newman / James McLaughlin3-6, 2-6
2025-02-11vs Ltc/Painter/McLarenLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarlos Navarro / Hernando Gonzalez vs Luis Zolezzi / Dennis Docil1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-02-04vs Piccolo/EstradaLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarlos Navarro / Hernando Gonzalez vs Philippe Chelle / Enrique Guzman Barron Escobedo3-6, 2-6
2025-01-28vs Wrc/GonzalezWon 10
W#4 DoublesHernando Gonzalez / Carlos Navarro vs Marcelo Aguiar / MARCO GARCIA6-4, 7-5
2025-01-21Won 10
W#4 DoublesHernando Gonzalez / Carlos Navarro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-14vs Midtown/EttedguiLost 01
L#3 DoublesHernando Gonzalez / Carlos Navarro vs Gustavo Pantin Plaza / Victor Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Arie Geller
published 4
3.81
Isaac Korn
published
3.76
Andres Rosenfeld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
MATIAS DAJCZ
published
3.70
John Cogan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Hernando Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Nicolas Gershanik
published
3.56
Martin Pollon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Carlos Navarro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Ariel Fleichman
published 4
Martin Huffmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Rosenfeld + MATIAS DAJCZ4154% games+0.3% vs expected
Hernando Gonzalez + Martin Pollon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arie Geller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Isaac Korn
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Andres Rosenfeld
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
MATIAS DAJCZ
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
John Cogan
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Hernando Gonzalez
10W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Nicolas Gershanik
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Martin Pollon
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carlos Navarro
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Ariel Fleichman
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Martin Huffmann
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.