Teams

Net Blazers

2022 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-21vs FramedWon 21
L#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Richard Sexton vs Dan Fredman / Clifton Wynter3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJ Nathan vs Jeffrey Brown7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesIshmael Alejo / Michael Zehr vs Matthew Ganney / Tony Chin6-4, 6-2
2022-07-20vs FramedWon 21
L#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Chris McNair vs Randall Brater / Tony Chin7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJ Nathan / Brett Otero vs Dan Fredman / Matthew Ganney5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Zehr / Richard Sexton vs David Kidwell Slak / Jeffrey Brown6-1, 7-6
2022-07-19vs FramedSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJ Nathan / Demetrius Crawford vs Dan Fredman / Tony Chin3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Zehr / Tom Smith vs Matthew Ganney / Clifton Wynter6-4, 6-4
2022-07-19vs FramedWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard Sexton / J Nathan vs Jeffrey Brown / Randall Brater7-6, 5-3
L#2 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Brett Otero vs Matthew Ganney / Ricardo Green6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Zehr / Tom Smith vs Segun Eubanks / Clifton Wynter6-0, 6-0
2022-07-17vs FramedWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Zehr / Tom Smith vs Dan Fredman / Ricardo Green6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJ Nathan vs Segun Eubanks6-1, 6-0
2022-07-07vs FramedLost 01
L#3 DoublesVic-Precious Njemanze / Michael Zehr vs Segun Eubanks / Jeffrey Brown3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Richard Sexton
published
3.79
J Nathan
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Amit Kapadia
published 4
Ishmael Alejo
published 4
3.73
Demetrius Crawford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Michael Zehr
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Demetrius Crawford + Richard Sexton2543% games+2.3% vs expected
Demetrius Crawford + Michael Zehr4548% gamesnot enough data
Demetrius Crawford + J Nathan224 matchesnot enough data
J Nathan + Michael Zehr314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Sexton
32W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
J Nathan
124W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Amit Kapadia
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ishmael Alejo
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Demetrius Crawford
204W–161L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Michael Zehr
90W–93L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.