Teams

OC LLW Coto De Caza - Kristina

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.0 W WD

15 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-03vs OC MVCC - KimWon 40
W#1 DoublesSherry Harley / Laura Baldwin vs Ryann Smith Groseclose / Cory Holcomb6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDebra Douglass vs Elizabeth Mesic6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKristina Hellinga / Patricia Szczuka vs Kim Diaz / Cindy Perkins7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFaith Agius / Marie Wilson vs Kaitlin King / Meghan Tripi6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSherry Harley / Pam Schuler vs Jennifer Urian / Hausin Wong6-1, 6-0
2025-06-26vs OC Nellie Gail - KateWon 40
W#1 DoublesKim Lewis / Laura Baldwin vs Kiersten Dummit / Kristina Hildebrandt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDebra Douglass vs Jyoti Mundi6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesFaith Agius / Emily Moradi vs Julie Gilpin / Irene Osiecki4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarie Wilson / Aimee Stevenson vs Brooke Janzen / Janna Karnezis7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-23vs OC Marbella CC - JulieWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Miranda / Pam Schuler vs Sarah Hallenbeck / Jennifer Kramer6-4, 7-5
2025-05-20vs OC T3 Tennis @JSerra - ReneeWon 31
L#1 DoublesMarie Wilson / Kristina Hellinga vs Renee Gershenson / Anita Boberg4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDebra Douglass vs Eileen Geffre6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSherry Harley / Lynda Sims vs Mina Santoro / Julie Gordon6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTina O'Rourke / Laura Baldwin vs Jean Walker / Miranda Taft6-0, 6-1
2025-05-16vs OC Lifetime RSC - JeanetteWon 10
W#1 DoublesPam Schuler / Nicole Miranda vs Brock Weaver / Lynette Merritt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-07vs OC Coto de Caza 2 - SaraLost 01
L#1 DoublesPam Schuler / Emily Moradi vs Sara Weiss / Kylie Kandell1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-01vs OC Dana Hills - SandyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherry Harley / Pam Schuler vs Annette Eckhardt / Sandy Sinden6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-21vs OC LNRC - AllysonWon 31
W#1 DoublesNicole Miranda / Sherry Harley vs Kelly F / Amanda Decarlo6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDebra Douglass vs Jen Innocenti6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKristina Hellinga / Patricia Szczuka vs Olga Kent / Vannak ONeill3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMarie Wilson / Emily Moradi vs Allyson Liu / Judy Boyea6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.0 W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Laura Baldwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Pam Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Patricia Szczuka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Nicole Miranda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Lynda Sims
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Debra Douglass
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.98
Sherry Harley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Emily Moradi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Tina O'Rourke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Kristina Hellinga
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Allison Mandel
published 3
Deborah Mueller
published 3
2.66
Aimee Stevenson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Faith Agius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberly Gangnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Hellinga + Laura Baldwin7162% games+10.9% vs expected
Nicole Miranda + Pam Schuler2439% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Harley + Laura Baldwin5072% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Harley + Lynda Sims314 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Harley + Nicole Miranda213 matchesnot enough data
Lynda Sims + Pam Schuler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Baldwin
20W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Pam Schuler
93W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Patricia Szczuka
14W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Nicole Miranda
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lynda Sims
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Debra Douglass
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Sherry Harley
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Emily Moradi
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Tina O'Rourke
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kristina Hellinga
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Allison Mandel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Deborah Mueller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Aimee Stevenson
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Faith Agius
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Gangnes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.