Teams

TCU SUDDERTH

2024 FW Ladies 18 & Over Social Summer Doubles League N · A

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Kera Watts
published
3.78
Katie Springer
published
3.41
Kirsten Hancock
published
3.36
Michelle Kaytaz
published 3.5
3.29
Laura Stein
published
3.19
Marcel Kerr
published
3.19
Jana Wallour
published
3.09
Hella Schafner
published
3.05
Janie Stephanow
published
3.02
Melis Carpenter
published
2.89
Nanette Commerford
published
2.88
Bonnie Sudderth
published 3
2.84
Midori Clark
published
2.82
Cass Weyandt
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Sudderth + Janie Stephanow3349% games−7.6% vs expected
Hella Schafner + Janie Stephanow3249% gamesnot enough data
Nanette Commerford + Melis Carpenter404 matchesnot enough data
Hella Schafner + Jana Wallour123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kera Watts
50W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Katie Springer
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Kirsten Hancock
26W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Michelle Kaytaz
127W–97L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Laura Stein
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Marcel Kerr
15W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Jana Wallour
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Hella Schafner
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Janie Stephanow
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Melis Carpenter
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Nanette Commerford
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Bonnie Sudderth
58W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Midori Clark
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.84
3
Cass Weyandt
9W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.