Teams

Western: SYRious competition

2025 18&Over Mixed · 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.58 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-15vs BinghamtonWon 20
W#1 DoublesSam Heinrich / Lesley Grants vs Mason Spottek / Paulette Weinheimer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoon Young Kim / Alexa Perry vs James Orr / Mia Hayes6-3, 6-3
2025-03-15vs BinghamtonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlexa Perry / Joon Young Kim vs Shawn James / Kathleen Hundley7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlexander McCarthy / Lesley Grants vs James Orr / Mia Hayes4-6, 4-6
2025-03-01vs BinghamtonWon 30
W#1 DoublesWen Lin / Eriksen Stropp vs Mia Hayes / Shawn James6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlexa Perry / Joon Young Kim vs Paulette Weinheimer / James Orr6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAllison Haynes / Kurran Singh vs Yelena Reporyeva / Franco Manriquez6-0, 6-1
2025-03-01vs BinghamtonWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexa Perry / Joon Young Kim vs Yelena Reporyeva / Shawn James6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllison Haynes / Kurran Singh vs Mia Hayes / James Orr6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWen Lin / Eriksen Stropp vs Tracy Sladish / Franco Manriquez6-0, 6-4
2025-02-08vs BinghamtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWen Lin / Eriksen Stropp vs Mason Spottek / Yelena Reporyeva7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesWonhee Cho / Allison Haynes vs Paul Caceres / Paulette Weinheimer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-08vs BinghamtonLost 02
L#2 DoublesEriksen Stropp / Alex Vizgaitis vs Mason Spottek / Paulette Weinheimer4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWonhee Cho / Allison Haynes vs Paul Caceres / Kathleen Hundley5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: SYRious competition4211714146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Allison Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.30
Alexa Perry
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.25
Joon Young Kim
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
4.24
Lesley Grants
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Alex Vizgaitis
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.16
Alexander McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Eriksen Stropp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Kurran Singh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.89
Ben Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Wen Lin
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Wonhee Cho
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eriksen Stropp + Wen Lin18165% games+7.0% vs expected
Joon Young Kim + Alexa Perry8260% games−1.0% vs expected
Kurran Singh + Allison Haynes4262% gamesnot enough data
Eriksen Stropp + Lesley Grants3255% gamesnot enough data
Ben Bradley + Lesley Grants224 matchesnot enough data
Joon Young Kim + Allison Haynes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Allison Haynes
15W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
4.56
4.5
Alexa Perry
46W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Joon Young Kim
118W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
4.25
Lesley Grants
54W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Alex Vizgaitis
116W–48L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Alexander McCarthy
52W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Eriksen Stropp
51W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
Kurran Singh
47W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
4.09
4.5
Ben Bradley
73W–105L career · 6 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.89
Wen Lin
89W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wonhee Cho
32W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.