Teams

Honey Deuce

2024 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 3.55 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Tracie Munds vs Zel Mertz / Terri Wippel0-6, 3-6
2024-05-01vs Simply SmashingWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Terri Mulcahy vs Patricia Hoffman / Christine Cannon6-0, 6-4
2024-04-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Terri Mulcahy vs Jennifer Johnson / Rebecca Fitzpatrick3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-15vs YOURS!Won 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Beagles / Kristin Mumford vs Monica Reagan / Jamie Hammond6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-10vs Volley LlamasWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracie Munds / Barbara Beagles vs Gayle Stauffer / Rosa Carnot6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Each Hit91291131290
2Aloha Beaches82261431319
3Fireball!73281233312
4Honey Deuce73271333320
5HCC Aces73251535341
6YOURS!55172353376
7No Bagels37172351393
8Net Party28152555398

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Heidi Stipp
published 4
3.37
Jennifer Sukow
published 3.5
3.37
Deniz Aygen
published 3.5
3.30
Lori Ewing
published 3.5
3.21
Terri Mulcahy
published 3.5
3.19
Karie Pappani
published 3.5
3.19
Christy Siemons
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.18
Dana Rusin
usually #3 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.16
Kristin Mumford
published 3.5
3.16
Molly Henrie
published 3.5
3.15
Barbara Beagles
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Erin Kohler
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Melanie Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Tamara Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Tracie Munds
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Rusin + Terri Mulcahy10255% games−2.5% vs expected
Melanie Mitchell + Lori Ewing162044% gamesnot enough data
Erin Kohler + Jennifer Sukow81252% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beagles + Terri Mulcahy10854% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Stipp + Dana Rusin14263% gamesnot enough data
Dana Rusin + Jennifer Sukow4642% gamesnot enough data
Dana Rusin + Christy Siemons3645% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Beagles + Heidi Stipp8065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heidi Stipp
166W–108L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jennifer Sukow
144W–145L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Deniz Aygen
149W–60L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Lori Ewing
92W–137L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Terri Mulcahy
84W–51L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Karie Pappani
153W–137L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Christy Siemons
29W–37L career · 8 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Dana Rusin
49W–37L career · 11 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kristin Mumford
132W–81L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Molly Henrie
122W–111L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Barbara Beagles
34W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Erin Kohler
75W–66L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Mitchell
44W–61L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tamara Clayton
24W–14L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracie Munds
20W–20L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.