Teams

FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-04vs SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK CW6.5CWon 30
W#1 DoublesRebecca Luong / Jenn Chou vs Natalie Schulz / Deepika Yelamanchi6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristine Rizzo / Mariko Kimura vs Diana Siler / Stephanie Beauchamps6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaori Asakawa / Terry Hunt vs Anna-liza Estoesta / Shree Bharathan6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Terry Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Rebecca Luong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Karen Toledo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Junko Tanaka
published
3.35
Kaori Asakawa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Caroline Tsoi
published 3.5
3.20
Kristine Rizzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Jenn Chou
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Yvette Gardner
published
3.15
Allison MacQueen
published 3.5
3.15
Yuko Miyagawa
published
3.13
Lauren Sagan
published
3.06
Becca Krass
published 3
2.97
Lan Wang
published
2.93
Erika Zheng
published
2.76
2.68
Lindsey Cavella
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaori Asakawa + Lan Wang404 matchesnot enough data
Junko Tanaka + Terry Hunt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terry Hunt
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
Rebecca Luong
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Karen Toledo
32W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Junko Tanaka
28W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Kaori Asakawa
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
3.5
Caroline Tsoi
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kristine Rizzo
24W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Jenn Chou
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Yvette Gardner
4W–18L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Allison MacQueen
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Yuko Miyagawa
12W–22L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Lauren Sagan
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Becca Krass
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Lan Wang
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Erika Zheng
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Audrey Throgmorton
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Lindsey Cavella
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.