Teams

LA - Tightly Strung Plus

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Women 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-09vs LA - Net SurfersLost 12
L#1 DoublesCathy Murphy / JoAnn Green vs Maureen Janmohamed / Caroline Rook4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTeri Hakomori / Teresa Throenle-Somaini vs Miriam Billington / Michele Shafroth3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAndrea Jordan-Walker / Crystal Alexander vs Gigi Cochrane / Hope Wintner6-3, 6-2
2026-08-04vs LA - MTG RacquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKandus Simpson / Cathy Murphy vs Sunhee Paik / Cathy Chermak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dill / Crystal Alexander vs Leslie Wright / Wendy Gross5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Leslie / Andrea Jordan-Walker vs Cecilia Terasaki / Lisa Kalin6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-04vs LA - MTG RacquettesLost 12
L#1 DoublesCrystal Alexander / Kandus Simpson vs Wendy Gross / Geraldine Farrell0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTeri Hakomori / Andrea Jordan-Walker vs Laura Winslow / Anette Levine6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Dill / Deborah Covell vs Tressa M Dhiab / Gillian Wiener0-6, 1-6
2026-07-30vs LA - Net SurfersWon 21
W#1 DoublesTeri Hakomori / Cathy Murphy vs Miriam Billington / Tracy Saltzman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoAnn Green / Mary Leslie vs Jodi Sherman / Kathleen Slattery6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Dill / Deborah Covell vs Michele Shafroth / Jane Guerin1-6, 2-6
2026-07-26vs LA - 55 LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoAnn Green / Suzanne Shamlian vs Angie Pradia / Meredith Cruse0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dill / Cathy Murphy vs JoAnn Ishii / Kimberly Toney4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTeresa Throenle-Somaini / JoAnn Green vs Laura Branigan / Andrea Shintani1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Shamlian / Mary Leslie vs Raquelle de la Rocha / Sonja Farmer1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Hakomori / Deborah Covell vs Michele Moshay / Sarina Hakimian3-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · LA - Women 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA LLW Volley Vamps - Millie Christie5113515138
2LA - 55 Love4210818150
3LA - MTG Racquettes4210819160
4LA - Tightly Strung Plus1561226185
5LA - Net Surfers1561227191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.71
Cathy Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Crystal Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
JoAnn Green
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Martha Swiller
published
2.57
Mary Leslie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Kandus Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Andrea Jordan-Walker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.51
Deborah Covell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Suzanne Shamlian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.35
Teresa Throenle-Somaini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Elizabeth Dill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Teri Hakomori
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cathy Murphy
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Crystal Alexander
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
JoAnn Green
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Martha Swiller
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Mary Leslie
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
Kandus Simpson
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
2.5
Andrea Jordan-Walker
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
3
Deborah Covell
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Suzanne Shamlian
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Teresa Throenle-Somaini
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Elizabeth Dill
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Teri Hakomori
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.