Teams

OP-Watson NETTERS (55s 8.5W)

2026 Neuse River Combo 55 & Over · 55s 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 55s 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OP-Watson NETTERS (55s 8.5W)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Stephanie Garner
published
3.75
Sherry Hambright
published
3.74
Mary Ringwalt
published
3.72
Ann Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Cheryl Watson
published 4
3.54
Denise Wells
published 4
3.50
Doris Smith
published
Lisa Freeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Garner + Doris Smith5075% games+8.6% vs expected
Sherry Hambright + Doris Smith12359% games+7.6% vs expected
Cheryl Watson + Ann Henderson5456% games−0.3% vs expected
Denise Wells + Doris Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Garner
15W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Sherry Hambright
15W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Mary Ringwalt
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Ann Henderson
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Cheryl Watson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Denise Wells
17W–10L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
Doris Smith
23W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Lisa Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.