Teams

JDS-C. JOHNSON

2025 MATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · 3.0 Women Night Thursday

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-04vs JDS-JOHNSONLost 01
L#2 DoublesRolonda Gaskins / Payton Churchwell vs Christine Samet / Elizabeth Herndon3-6, 3-6
2025-02-18vs JDS-JOHNSONWon 10
W#2 DoublesRolonda Gaskins / Mary Morgan vs Dana Johnson / Peggy Elliott6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-11vs JDS-JOHNSONWon 10
W#1 DoublesRolonda Gaskins / Payton Churchwell vs Peggy Elliott / Phyllis Lane4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-04vs JDS-MORGANLost 02
L#1 SinglesRolonda Gaskins vs Dana Johnson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHilary Ellwood / Anne Tunnessen vs Shaneji Ward / Payton Churchwell4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Night Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
MICHELLE BROWN
published
2.88
Rolonda Gaskins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.86
2.83
Anne Tunnessen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Tanja Battle
published
Betty Riley
published 3
2.67
Clara Quintero
published 3
2.58
Tracie Revis
published
2.56
Rocio Quintero
published
2.25
Alpa Patel
published 2.5
1.96
Monica Stephens
published
Margaret Symington
published
Winona Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rolonda Gaskins + MICHELLE BROWN12754% games+3.8% vs expected
Rocio Quintero + Clara Quintero9849% games+3.1% vs expected
Margaret Symington + Betty Riley3351% gamesnot enough data
Monica Stephens + Alpa Patel0636% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Boulware + Margaret Symington224 matchesnot enough data
MICHELLE BROWN + Winona Davis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MICHELLE BROWN
52W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Rolonda Gaskins
61W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Elizabeth Boulware
13W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Anne Tunnessen
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
Tanja Battle
20W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Betty Riley
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Clara Quintero
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Tracie Revis
8W–22L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Rocio Quintero
12W–20L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
2.5
Alpa Patel
13W–40L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
Monica Stephens
3W–45L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Margaret Symington
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Winona Davis
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.